Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Jayakumar Vs Chandrakumar

Jayakumar vs Chandrakumar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 20, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1531825

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP(MD)/755/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jayakumar

Respondent

Chandrakumar

Excerpt

c.m.p.(md)no.755 of 2026 in c.r.p.(md)sr.no.2496 of 2026n.senthilkumar, j.the present civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 93 days in filing the above civil revision petition. 2.heard the learned counsel for the petitioner learned counsel for first respondent. 3.mr.aathimoola pandian, learned counsel filed a memo to show that the 2nd respondent, who is the deceased has no legal heirs and the said memo was furnished to the counsel for the 1st respondent and the counsel for 1st respondent has also confirmed the same.4. being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this petition, this court is inclined to condone the delay of 93 days of filing the above revision.5. accordingly, the delay is condoned and this civil miscellaneous petition is allowed. registry is directed to number the civil revision petition, if it is otherwise in order. 20.02.2026 trp _______________ page 1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.(MD)No.755 of 2026 in C.R.P.(MD)SR.No.2496 of 2026

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

The present Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 93 days in filing the above Civil Revision Petition. 2.Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner learned counsel for first respondent. 3.Mr.Aathimoola Pandian, learned counsel filed a memo to show that the 2nd respondent, who is the deceased has no legal heirs and the said memo was furnished to the counsel for the 1st respondent and the counsel for 1st respondent has also confirmed the same.

4. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Court is inclined to condone the delay of 93 days of filing the above revision.

5. Accordingly, the delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the Civil Revision Petition, if it is otherwise in order. 20.02.2026 trp _______________ Page 1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Jayakumar vs Chandrakumar Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice N.Senthilkumar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales