Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dileepkumar vs Maby John

Dileepkumar vs Maby John

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Nov 01, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1526982

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RFA/230/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dileepkumar

Respondent

Maby John

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan tuesday, the 1st day of november 2022 / 10th karthika, 1944 rfa (indigent) no. 230 of 2022 & cmcp no. 19 of 2016 against the judgment and decree dated 14.10.2015 in os 62/2012 of sub court, muvattupuzha appellants/defendants no.3,4&2: 1 dileepkumar k.v., s/o.vellappan, aged 46, konnayath house, vellarode, mankara p.o., palakkad district. 2 prajesh r. s/o.late raghavan, karunkad house, muttimampallam, nattukal p.o., palakkad district. 3 arunkumar m, s/o.late ramachandra menon, house no.99, chandra nagar, palakkad -7. by adv n.u.harikrishna respondents/plaintiff, defendant no.1 & state:1 maby john proprietor,chariot rubbers, rubber dealers, paingottoor, rep.by power holder johny paul, s/o.paul, aged 56, kalathil house, paingottoor kara, kadavoor village, kothamangalam taluk, ernakulam dist. 682311. 2 malabar rubber rubber industries pampupara, walayar, palakkad dist.678624, rep.by the managing partner. 3 state of kerala rep by chef secretary, govt.of kerala, govt secretariat thiruvananthapuram. by advs. v.k.peermohamed khanthis regular first appeal having come up for admission on 01.11.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellante fairly submitted that he is not pressing the appeal as well as the cmcp. submission is recorded. the cmcp is dismissed as not pressed. appeal will stand rejected under order vii rule 11 cpc. appellant is exempted from payment of the court fee payable at the initial stage under section 66 of the kerala court fees and suits valuaiton act. sd/- p.somarajan judge rkr-01/11

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 10TH KARTHIKA, 1944 RFA (INDIGENT) NO. 230 OF 2022 & CMCP NO. 19 OF 2016 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.10.2015 IN OS 62/2012 OF SUB COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS NO.3,4&2: 1 DILEEPKUMAR K.V., S/O.VELLAPPAN, AGED 46, KONNAYATH HOUSE, VELLARODE, MANKARA P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 2 PRAJESH R. S/O.LATE RAGHAVAN, KARUNKAD HOUSE, MUTTIMAMPALLAM, NATTUKAL P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3 ARUNKUMAR M, S/O.LATE RAMACHANDRA MENON, HOUSE NO.99, CHANDRA NAGAR, PALAKKAD -7. BY ADV N.U.HARIKRISHNA RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANT NO.1 & STATE:

1 MABY JOHN PROPRIETOR,CHARIOT RUBBERS, RUBBER DEALERS, PAINGOTTOOR, REP.BY POWER HOLDER JOHNY PAUL, S/O.PAUL, AGED 56, KALATHIL HOUSE, PAINGOTTOOR KARA, KADAVOOR VILLAGE, KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK, ERNAKULAM DIST. 682311. 2 MALABAR RUBBER RUBBER INDUSTRIES PAMPUPARA, WALAYAR, PALAKKAD DIST.678624, REP.BY THE MANAGING PARTNER. 3 STATE OF KERALA REP BY CHEF SECRETARY, GOVT.OF KERALA, GOVT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. V.K.PEERMOHAMED KHAN

THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellante fairly submitted that he is not pressing the appeal as well as the CMCP. Submission is recorded. The CMCP is dismissed as not pressed. Appeal will stand rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Appellant is exempted from payment of the court fee payable at the initial stage under Section 66 of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuaiton Act. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE rkr-01/11

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial