Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aruna E.R vs State of Kerala

Aruna E.R vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 19, 2022
~8 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1526112

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/23415/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aruna E.R

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....it ioners before secretarr, entikuze[r grain pancm¥ath. exhibit p9 true copy of represeintation i)td.29.10.2020 subiatml> by the peiitlciners bero re 4te[ respcne re . einibit plo true copy of plmi did.nii, c?pe , ernakulam mediation centre (high court hall) (2nd floor, above sbl, high court building, ernakulam, kochi-31.(ph;0484-2562238) emc;reg no..j.5a.1 dated "?3 fry from the nodal officer, high court mediation centre. to the registrar uudicial) high court of kerala, ernakulam. sub : mediation of case referred by the hon'ble high court of kerala - reg. 6&:ys,r ref : referral order in ..,. „wp dated ...,,... of the honorable high court of kerala -:------------:i am to forward herewith report of the mediator in the matter along withtheende\esforinformationandnecessaryaction yours faithfully, ` `, 6fty, nodal officer, ernakulam mediation centre v/v encl:-1. report of the mediator, settlement agreement2. copy of the referral order dated ........ of the high court of kerala..3. copy of the petitionbefore the honourable high court of kerala at ernakulam w.p.c no.23415 of 2015 aruna k.r. & others petitioners vs. state of kerala & others respondents ® rep.ortsubmll tedbythemediator adv- p-r. parties could settled their dispute, settlement agreement has been signed by the petitioners, 1st & 8th respondents only, as all other respondents were formal parties, to this proceedings, hence they have not signed the settlement agreement. r) mediation terminated, returned the file back to the hon'ble high court of kerala, along with this settlement agreement, signed by the parties, for further proceedings of this hon'ble court. dated this the 27th day of september, 2022. mediator ernakulam mediation centre () before the honourable high court of kerala at ernakulam wp(c). no.23415 of 2020 aruna k.r & others petitioners vs. state of kerala & others respondents 0 memorandum of settlement agreement under section 89 0f the code.....

Full Judgment

IN THE ]IIGH col7RT oF RERAla AT EBNAm JI.zii4 PFESENT TEE HONOuEui BLE rm. OusTlcE I.R.RAVI wEDNEsrmLr, TEE 19m mr oF Oouo BER 2022 / 27TEI ASwl NA, 1944 wEitci ro. 23415 OF 2020 PErmlcm-: I- 45 - ARun I.R W/O. K. SAJEEV, RAIPENPIACKAI. HOUSE , KozHtrm)LLT. p.o, inDlmssnroolA, TEDRIssuR I>ISTRlcT-68o752 , maM ERZLKUTE[Iyll. HOusE , puNRAy AR , KEN.IRTZEry . p . 0 , IDt7ml DlsTRlcT-6856o3. s EH=L.col . I . a , zi GED 42 rmRs W/o . K . R . RAru , CE[c QUARTEErs , VDAKKEKnD . E> . o , vn DAREKAD , Tmlssun DIsmlcT-679562 , mcol ERzimnElrll. Eoo SE , ptlmmrm, EN.IRTZErr . p . o , IDt]REI DIsmlcT-685603 . SZ-.E.R' AGue 41 yEas w/o . DANT , REEild TEIL E[ousE , ENTIRTZB¥ . p . o , vnTro NPARIL , KZLNJIKUZEIY. P. O, IDUREI DISTRICT-685603 , FRch4 ERAKUTEIIYII. HousE , pu NNA¥AR , Ka NBIK[TZH¥ . p . o , IDt7REI DlsmlcT-685 6o3 .

BY ADVS . GEORGE rmTEn RT SRI . M . D . Sac IK[rmR SRI . PRHVEEN S . SRI.SUNII. RInnR A.a SRI.DIPU JRES sEml . RATHEw K . I . sml.GEOEreE R.v. RESE'ONDERTS : sT[LRE .oF RERAln REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEEiARn ENT oF RErENu= , cOvEaermT SECRETARIAT,THIRuvAimNTELapu REN-695oo1. TEE DlsmlcT cot.LECTOR, IDt7REI , clvll. STATION , pAINavu . p . 0 , mnrlinaln , IDtlml-685603 . iap{c» No. 23415 oF 2o2o TEp= R=vEit7= Drvslorml. oFFla=R, REVENUE I)IVISIONZLI. OFFICER, PAINZIW. P. O, in)¥II,nnlA,IDt7RII-685603. TEb= TAISIIDZLR , TAI.t JK OFFICRE , IDUREI , VANCHIKAVAIA , IDURIcl co LON¥.p.o, CHERumo NI, IDtmal~68.5€o2 . TfE spEcl AI. TziHsl LD]m, Lmil) ASSI®D4ENT , KARImNooR , THODupuz EIA TAI,uK , II>t7ml-685581. TEE VILILAGE OFFICER, VIIIIAGE OFFICE , ENJIRTZHY , EN.IEcuzE¥. p.o, IDt7Eutl TAI.tin Ale DlsTRlcT-6856o3. SELRET , a/o.IATE I.p.RIudrmlsnmN, AGRED 4o ¥EARs, ERAKUTHI¥IL HousE , pt7mt ATAR , EN.IRI7zH¥ . p . o , IDtmal TAI+tin A)o DIsmlcT-6856o3. rml RA Drvl , AGED 37 lr EARS w/O. smld FT , ERAK(7THlyll, E[OusE , ptnrm¥AR , KaN4IRIIZEIT . p . o , IDUEu CI TAliuK AND DISTRICT-685603.

`By anvs . sml . snc HIN Rzii GSH sior. DEEPA. v. Gp. TEls WRIT PETITION (clvll,) EavlN6 ccaa up FOR aeMlssloN ON 19.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE Sale DAY DEI.IVEREI) THE ro III,-G: wp{c) ,ro. 23415 oF 2o2o T.R. RAVI' I. W.P.(C) No.23415 of 2020 Dated this the 19th day of October, 2022

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition was directed to be placed before the Mediation Centre for attempting a settlement. The Mediation Centre has forwarded the report of the Mediator stating that the issue has been settled between the parties. A memorandum of settlement drawn up has .also been-placed before this Court. In view of the settlement arrived, this writ petition is closed incorporating the memorandum of settlement as part of this

judgment.

Sd/- T.R.RAVI JUDGE mpm WP(C) NO. 23415 0F 2020 APPENDIX OF WPIC} 23415/2020 pEgITIONERs. E]nlBITs EXHIBIT P1 TRtJ= COPY OF DOC. NO. 2452 ID/67/2 6 DT.16. 06.2011 ISSUED TO RATE I.p.RAI>nmlsEDmN 8¥ 2ND REsporo ERT. rml BIT P2 TRIJE COPY OF COD.NO. 2421/II)/67/4 DID.16.06.2011 ISSUED TO 7TH RESPONDENT BY 210 RESEc ORE. rml BIT P3 TRUE copy OF REEiREsmi TATION DID.21. oi.2Oi8 Su BMI TIED 8¥ pETITloNERs BEFonE 5TE[ RE SPONI)ERE . EHIBIT P4 "UE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DID.21.01.2019 SUBMITTED BY PET ITIONERS BEFORE 2ND Eu SPONDERT . rml BIT P5 TEng= CX)Err oF REPRISE.mTIcmT DID.05.03.2020 suEm TfiD By Ei ETI TloNERs BEFio RE 4TH RE SPONDERT . rml BIT P6 TRt JE COPY OF PETITION DD 20.06.2020 suEm TTED Br PET I I IoN=Rs BEroE`E 3RD REsporo RE . EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF RARER NO.RD0IDK/660/2020-85 Din.o8.o7.202O Issu ED By 3RD R=sporomvT. EHIBIT P8 TRIJE Cop¥ oF RERESFBmTIcn FT DID . 2g . 06 . 2o2o SURETTED BY RE PET IT IONERS BEFORE sECRETARr, ENTIKuzE[r GRAin pANcm¥ATH. EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF REPRESEINTATION I)TD.29.10.2020 suBiaTml> By THE pEIITlcINERs BEro RE 4TE[ REspcne RE . Einibit Plo TRUE Copy oF pLmi DID.NII, c?pe , ERNAKULAM MEDIATION CENTRE (HIGH COURT HALL) (2nd floor, above SBl, High Court Building, Ernakulam, Kochi-31.(Ph;0484-2562238) EMc;Reg No..J.5a.1 Dated "?3 fry From The Nodal Officer, High Court Mediation Centre. To The Registrar Uudicial) High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam. Sub : Mediation of case referred by the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala - reg. 6&:ys,r Ref : Referral order in ..,. „WP dated ...,,... of the Honorable High court of Kerala -:------------:

I am to forward herewith Report of the Mediator in the matter along withtheende\esforinformationandnecessaryaction Yours Faithfully, ` `, 6fty, Nodal Officer, Ernakulam Mediation Centre v/v Encl:-1. Report of the Mediator, Settlement Agreement

2. Copy of the referral order dated ........ of the High court of Kerala..

3. Copy of the Petition

BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM W.P.C No.23415 of 2015 Aruna K.R. & Others Petitioners Vs. State of Kerala & Others Respondents ® REP.ORTSUBMll TEDBYTHEMEDIATOR ADV- P-R. Parties could settled their dispute, settlement agreement has been signed by the petitioners, 1st & 8th respondents only, as all other respondents were formal parties, to this proceedings, hence they have not signed the settlement agreement. r) Mediation terminated, returned the file back to the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala, along with this settlement agreement, signed by the parties, for further proceedings of this Hon'ble Court. Dated this the 27th day of September, 2022. Mediator Ernakulam Mediation Centre () BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C). No.23415 of 2020 Aruna K.R & Others Petitioners Vs. State of Kerala & Others Respondents 0 MEMORANDUM OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 89 0F THE CODE 0F CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH RULES 24 & 25 0F THE KERALA CIV.L PROCEDURE (MEDIATION), RULES, 2008: |St Petitioner Aruna E.R, 2nd Petitioner Sheljimol E.R and 3rd Petitioner, Sajalamma E.R and 7th Respondent Shalet, and 8th Respondent Ambika Devi have decided to settle their dispute on the following terms and conditions:

1. Both petitioners and contesting respondents 7 and 8 have

decided to partition the property in dispute and covered as rl per Ext.Pl having a total extent of 1.6930 Hector in Survey No.88/16 in Kanjikuzhi Village of ldukki Taluk and District (formerly Thodupuzha Taluk) by two division. Out of the total extent of 4 Acres and 18 Cents (1.6930 Hectors) the petitioners have agreed to take 1.05 Acre of land jointly towards their shares and respondents 7 and 8 have agreed to take the balance property towards their share. fgiv •,.i.. ' l:_ts\:uJ -,-. XeralaSlateMediationandConciliationCentro High Court of Kerala Lsri±S±fr.fl Kochj - 682 031 -2-

2. The sketch and measurement of the property earmarked

for petitioners is attached along with this settlement agreement, and both parties have agreed to take possession & ownership of the respective properties from the date of signing of this settlement agreement and recording of the same by this Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in the above case.

3. Respondents 7 and 8 agree that they will release their ® right in the property given to the petitioners as per this settlement even if the patta issued as per Kerala Land Assignment Act and Rules is in.their name.

4. Both parties have agreed that no further claims against

each other among them in connection with the disputed property of whatsoever nature and also agree to bear their respective cost of this case, Dated this the 27th day of September, 2022. rl Petitioners ResDondent No.7 & 8

1. ArunaE.R, gr 7. Shalet

2. Sheljimol E.R •...`l_i.:,.,'. 8. Ambika Devi Aife`u.

R al-, onuqu,f.,"\nq, Counsel fo Counsel for Respondent 7 & 8 ..,.rT,`. Kerala State Mediation and Conciliation Centre H(gh Court of Kerala Kochi -682 031 VERIFICATION We, the parties above named, do hereby solemnly state and declare that what is contained in paragraphs 1 to 4 are true to the best of our knowledge, information and belief. Dated this the 27th day of September, 2022. Petitioners ResDondent No.7 & 8 ®

1. Aruna E.R, /ion, 7. Shalet 2.sheljimo IE.Rrgr 8.AmbikaDeviAj®j4¥`

3. Sajalamma E.R dy .,;i Xerala State Mediation and Concjlialion Centre High Court of Kerala r) Kochi -682 031 r JiiD| ?I /7.q al~A2i4KA2;`3 -. / 77z3>.og Jfpe+2s <46-7£ R07,9sc€>`>s -. 47 6 .j`® 9T .? A. c5 -I r-,64-,> Crl 7 . 3cX. q . gr - gl -c5rLl i-9 . H Z) '/ X./c) •.`` _8- EE=EEE ='\:a-i= -\€ ft A Atrybj ka c/ov. rdng` €'4ut"fakpez ,zof # #.,c;?,:nd„ -:-_:-..-:----:-:- ; asaJanme^ E.r` Fed44

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial