Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smt Puttamma vs Smt Jayanthi

Smt Puttamma vs Smt Jayanthi

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Feb 27, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1525785

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MFA/1406/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smt Puttamma

Respondent

Smt Jayanthi

Excerpt

.....kadubeesanahalli, marathahalli, outer ring road, bangalore -560 103. represented by its managing director mr. d. kishore3. mrs. roopa m cdaughter of late j m chandrappa, wife of vishnu kumar g, aged about 32 years, residing at no.2165, d block, channakeshava nilaya, sahakara nagar, bengaluru-560 092.4. m/s. university of agricultural sciencesemployees house building co-operative society ltd., having its office at no.69, shivanahalli, jakkur main road, yelahanka, bangalore-560 064. by its authorized representative …respondents this miscellaneous first appeal is filed underorder 43 rule 1 of the code of civil procedure, 1908.-3- this miscellaneous first appeal is listed for orders, this day, the judgment is delivered as under:oral judgmentsri.ajith.n., counsel on behalf of sri.subramanya s.upasana., for the appellants appeared in person.2. the appeal is listed today for orders regarding maintainability of the appeal.3. counsel for the appellants submit that theappellants may be permitted to withdraw the appeal and file writ petition in accordance with the law. when queried counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have taken a conscious decision to withdraw the appeal and file writ petition.4. the oral submission made by counsel for the appellants is placed on record.5. accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.liberty is accorded for the appellants to file a writ petition if so advised, in accordance with the law. -4- because of withdrawal of the appeal, the registry concerned is hereby directed to return all the originals by replacing the same with xerox copies. sd/- (jyoti m) judge mrp list no.: 1 sl no.: 17

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1406 OF 2026 (CPC) BETWEEN:

1. SMT PUTTAMMA

W/O. LATE SRI. MUNISWAMAPPA, SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES SMT. SUMITHRA, W/O. LATE SRI. KRISHNAPPA, D/O. LATE SRI. MUNISWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.214, YELAHANKA MAIN ROAD, OPPOSITE GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, JAKKUR, BANGALORE-560 064.

2. MS. JAYASHREE S

Digitally signed by      W/O. LATE SRI. PRABHAKAR,
PREMCHANDRA M R          AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
Location: HIGH           RESIDING AT NO.29, HOTTEPPA LAYOUT,
COURT OF                 AMRUTHAHALLI, SAHAKARANAGARA,

KARNATAKA BANGALORE-560 092.

3. SRI. RAJANNA J.M

S/O. LATE SRI. MUNISWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.156/1, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, OPPOSITE KATESHWAR SWAMY TEMPLE, JAKKUR, BENGALURU-560 064. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. AJITH N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SUBRAMANYA S. UPASANA, ADVOCATE) -2- AND:

1. SMT JAYANTHI WIFE OF LATE J M CHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.867, D BLOCK, SAHAKARA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 092.

2. M/S. MANA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED

A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 20/7, 'SWAMY LEGATO', 3RD FLOOR, KADUBEESANAHALLI, MARATHAHALLI, OUTER RING ROAD, BANGALORE -560 103. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. D. KISHORE

3. MRS. ROOPA M C

DAUGHTER OF LATE J M CHANDRAPPA, WIFE OF VISHNU KUMAR G, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.2165, D BLOCK, CHANNAKESHAVA NILAYA, SAHAKARA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 092.

4. M/S. UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.69, SHIVANAHALLI, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560 064. BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE …RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER

ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.

-3- THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER:

ORAL JUDGMENT

Sri.Ajith.N., counsel on behalf of Sri.Subramanya S.Upasana., for the appellants appeared in person.

2. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding maintainability of the appeal.

3. Counsel for the appellants submit that the

appellants may be permitted to withdraw the appeal and file Writ Petition in accordance with the law. When queried counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have taken a conscious decision to withdraw the appeal and file writ petition.

4. The oral submission made by counsel for the appellants is placed on record.

5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Liberty is accorded for the appellants to file a writ petition if so advised, in accordance with the law. -4- Because of withdrawal of the appeal, the Registry concerned is hereby directed to return all the originals by replacing the same with Xerox copies. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial