Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mrs. Reena Jaiswal vs Mr. Ajeet Kumar Jaiswal

Mrs. Reena Jaiswal vs Mr. Ajeet Kumar Jaiswal

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Mar 09, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1521696

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/4687/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mrs. Reena Jaiswal

Respondent

Mr. Ajeet Kumar Jaiswal

Excerpt

.....by the petitioner (as per annx- c) alternatively, to prayer ii, direct the learned trial court to pass orders on ia no.4 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order (as per annx- c) and etc. -2-this petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:coram: hon'ble dr. justice k.manmadha raooral orderthis writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer: “it is most respectfully prayed that this hon'ble court may be pleased to: i. set aside the order dated 05.02.2026 passed by the ii addl. family court judge at bengaluru in m.c.no.7646/2023 to the extent that the matter stands adjourned to 27.02.2025; [as per annexure a, a1 and a2]. ii. allow i.a. no. 4 filed by the petitioner; [as per annexure-c) iii. alternatively, to prayer ii, direct the learned trial court to pass orders on i.a. no. 4 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order: [as per annexure-c] iv. direct the learned trial court to dispose of m.c. no. 7646 of 2023 within a period of three months by holding day-to-day trial; v. grant such other reliefs as this hon'ble court may be deem fit in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. -3-3. it is the case of the petitioner that the mc is of the year 2023 and in the year 2024, i.a.no.4 is filed seeking maintenance, so far the said i.a. is not disposed of by the family court.4. whenever an i.a. is filed seeking interimmaintenance, the court has to consider and pass orders as expeditiously as possible. if another application is filed for rejection of plaint that could be considered in the due course and for two years the applications of this nature, which is for the immediate requirement of the parties cannot be kept pending. in that view of the matter, this court deems it appropriate to pass the following:orderi. accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the family court to decide.....

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 4687 OF 2026 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: MRS. REENA JAISWAL D/O LATE MR. BIRENDRA KUMAR SHAW, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT FLAT NO.101, FIRST FLOOR, NO.127, 6TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN, CSB LAYOUT, KASAVANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 035. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHARGAVA D. BHAT.,ADVOCATE) AND: MR. AJEET KUMAR JAISWAL S/O LATE SRI. N.P. JAISWAL, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDING AT AADHAAR, Digitally signed

by                 H.NO.3-3-120/A,
VIJAYALAKSHMI      CHAPPAL BAZAR,
BN                 KACHIGUDA,
Location: HIGH     HYDERABAD-500 027.
COURT OF                                                       …RESPONDENT

KARNATAKA

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 05.02.2026 PASSED BY THE II ADDL. FAMILY COURT JUDGE AT BENGALURU IN M.C NO.7646/2023 TO THE EXTENT THAT THE MATTER STANDS ADJOURNED TO 27.02.2025 (AS PER ANNX-A, A1 AND A2) ALLOW IA NO. 4 FILED BY THE PETITIONER (AS PER ANNX- C) ALTERNATIVELY, TO PRAYER II, DIRECT THE LEARNED TRIAL COURT TO PASS ORDERS ON IA NO.4 WITHIN A PERIOD OF TWO WEEKS FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF THIS ORDER (AS PER ANNX- C) AND ETC. -2-

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

ORAL ORDER

This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer: “It is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: I. Set aside the Order dated 05.02.2026 passed by the II Addl. Family Court Judge at Bengaluru in M.C.No.7646/2023 to the extent that the matter stands adjourned to 27.02.2025; [As Per Annexure A, A1 and A2]. II. Allow I.A. No. 4 filed by the Petitioner; [As Per Annexure-C) III. Alternatively, to prayer II, direct the Learned Trial Court to pass orders on I.A. No. 4 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order: [As per Annexure-C] IV. Direct the Learned Trial Court to dispose of M.C. No. 7646 of 2023 within a period of three months by holding day-to-day trial; V. Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may be deem fit in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. -3-

3. It is the case of the petitioner that the MC is of the year 2023 and in the year 2024, I.A.No.4 is filed seeking maintenance, so far the said I.A. is not disposed of by the Family Court.

4. Whenever an I.A. is filed seeking interim

maintenance, the Court has to consider and pass orders as expeditiously as possible. If another application is filed for rejection of plaint that could be considered in the due course and for two years the applications of this nature, which is for the immediate requirement of the parties cannot be kept pending. In that view of the matter, this Court deems it appropriate to pass the following:

ORDER

i. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Family Court to decide the I.A. on or before 26.03.2026. ii. This Court is not issuing the notice to the respondent as no adverse orders are passed -4- and disposed of the petition is in the interest of both the parties. iii. All I.As., in the writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial