The Manager vs Puttamma

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Feb 25, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1521167

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1521167
Court: Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge: B M Shyam Prasad
Decided On: Feb 25, 2026
Case Number: WP/4171/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Manager

Respondent

Puttamma

Excerpt

.....constitution of india praying to quash the orders on ia no.1 dated 12-09-2025 passed by the court of the xiii additional judge, chief judge, court of small causes bangalore in mv.c. no.2323/2025 at annexure - a and etc. this petition, coming on for orders, this day, order was made therein as under: coram: hon'ble mr. justice b m shyam prasad -3-oral orderthis petition is by the insurer who is called upon to answer a claim under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 [for short, 'the act'] in the claim petition in mvc no.2323/2025 on the file of the xiii additional judge, court of small causes, bengaluru [for short, 'the tribunal']. the claimant has filed an application under section 5 of the limitation act, 1963 for condonation of the delay in filing theclaim petition. the tribunal, by the impugned orderdated 12.09.2025, has allowed the application filed by the claimant. the question: whether a belated claim petition could be entertained condoning the delay under section 5 of the limitation act, 1963 is pending with the apex court in slp nos.8412-8413/2023 and similar matters in the writ petition in wp [civil] no.undisputed that the apex court by its interim order-4- dated 16.12.2025 has observed that the pendency of the writ petitions/special leave petitions before it shall not come in the way of the claim petitions being adjudicated by the tribunals but with the stipulation that judgments shall not be finalized. this court is of the considered view that with the afore-stipulation, this petition must be disposed of observing that the tribunal's impugned order will be subject to the outcome in the pending matters before the apex court. with this arrangement, the inquiry into the merits of the claim petition will continue, but the tribunal will refrain from pronouncing its judgment and award so that the decision on the merit of the claim petition otherwise will be subject to the apex court’s decision on the afore question. -5-.....

Full Judgment

-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4171 OF 2026 (GM-AC) BETWEEN: THE MANAGER IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED SHANTHI TOWERS, 5TH FLOOR NO.141, 3RD MAIN, EAST TO NGEF LAYOUT KASTHURINAGAR, BENGALURU -560043 REP. BY ITS MANAGER NARENDRA S COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANY ACT - 1956 Digitally signed by …PETITIONER VANAMALA N (BY SRI. B. PRADEEP., ADVOCATE) Location: HIGH AND: COURT OF KARNATAKA
1. PUTTAMMA W/O MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT MUTHASANDRA VILLAGE MAYASANDRA BANGALORE - 562 107 -2-
2. JAY JAGANNATH SAMAL EVENT PRODUCTION REPTD. BY IT'S AUTHORISED SIGNATORY NO.23, AS NO. 85 KURUBARAHALLI VILLAGE TAVAREKERE HOBLI BANGALORE -560043 REP. BY IT'S MANAGER
…RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS ON IA NO.1 DATED 12-09-2025 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE XIII ADDITIONAL JUDGE, CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES BANGALORE IN MV.C. NO.2323/2025 AT ANNEXURE - A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD -3-

ORAL ORDER

This petition is by the Insurer who is called upon to answer a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [for short, 'the Act'] in the claim petition in MVC No.2323/2025 on the file of the XIII Additional Judge, Court of Small Causes, Bengaluru [for short, 'the Tribunal']. The claimant has filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of the delay in filing the

claim petition. The Tribunal, by the impugned order

dated 12.09.2025, has allowed the application filed by the claimant. The question: whether a belated claim petition could be entertained condoning the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is pending with the Apex Court in SLP Nos.8412-8413/2023 and similar matters in the writ petition in WP [Civil] No.

undisputed that the Apex Court by its interim order

-4- dated 16.12.2025 has observed that the pendency of the writ petitions/special leave petitions before it shall not come in the way of the claim petitions being adjudicated by the Tribunals but with the stipulation that judgments shall not be finalized. This Court is of the considered view that with the afore-stipulation, this petition must be disposed of observing that the Tribunal's impugned order will be subject to the outcome in the pending matters before the Apex Court. With this arrangement, the inquiry into the merits of the claim petition will continue, but the Tribunal will refrain from pronouncing its judgment and award so that the decision on the merit of the claim petition otherwise will be subject to the Apex Court’s decision on the afore question. -5- The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE NV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15

Same Court & Year Karnataka Orders · 2026 Same Parties The Manager vs Puttamma Same Judge B M Shyam Prasad