Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.Ditty Tom vs the a.E.O.and Others

P.Ditty Tom vs The a.E.O.and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Sep 16, 2022
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1520990

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/14499/2010

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Ditty Tom

Respondent

The a.E.O.and Others

Excerpt

.....of the case. (sic)2. according to the petitioner, she is an approvedteacher in the 3rd respondent school since 07.06.2004. the grievance of the petitioner is that she has not received salary. the petitioner is challenging ext.p4 order passed by the assistant educational officer, by which the 2 nd respondent was directed to stop the payment of salary to the teachers whose appointment was approved on the strength of the judgment in w.p.(c). no.20369 of 2006 in the light of the stay order passed by the division bench. when this writ petition came up for consideration on 15.09.2022, there was no representation for the petitioner. hence the case was posted to today. today also there is no representation. probably the prayers in this writ petition might have been infructuous. therefore, this writ petition is dismissed. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan jv judge appendix of wp(c) 14499/2010 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the appointment order of the petitioner exhibit p2 true copy of the appointment order of the smt.shibi u.m.exhibit p3 true copy of the orderno.b-2153/09/d.dis of the assistant edl.officer. exhibit p4 true copy of the order no.b-579/2010/ of the assistant educational officer.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 25TH BHADRA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 14499 OF 2010 PETITIONER: P.DITTY TOM, W/O.P.LIJOY JOHN AGED 30 YEARS, UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, ST.THOMAS U.P.SCHOOL, PARANNUR,, CHOONDAL, THRISSUR DISTRICT. , SRI.K.E.HAMZA SRI.T.V.VIJAYARAJAN RESPONDENTS: 1 THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT,PIN-680503 2 THE HEADMASTER, ST.THOMAS U.P.SCHOOL, PARANNUR, CHOONDAL, 3 THE MANAGER, ST.THOMAS U.P.SCHOOL, PARANNUR CHOONDAL, KUNNAMKULAM EDUCATIONAL SUB DISTRICT, GOVERNMENT PLEADER M.SASINDRAN OTHER PRESENT: SRI.C.N.PRABHAKARAN, SR.GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.09.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

-------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.14499 of 2010 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of September, 2022

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed with following prayers: i. Call for the records relating to Exhibit P-4 and quash the original of the same by the issue of a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ or

order.

ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate Respondents to disburse the pay and allowances to the Petitioner so long as her approval continues and also Exhibit P-3 is in force. iii. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate Respondents to disburse the salary of the Petitioner for the month of April 2010 onwards, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. iv. Pass such other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to grant in the circumstances of the case. (SIC)

2. According to the petitioner, she is an approved

teacher in the 3rd respondent School since 07.06.2004. The grievance of the petitioner is that she has not received salary. The petitioner is challenging Ext.P4 order passed by the Assistant Educational Officer, by which the 2 nd respondent was directed to stop the payment of salary to the teachers whose appointment was approved on the strength of the judgment in W.P.(C). No.20369 of 2006 in the light of the stay order passed by the Division Bench. When this writ petition came up for consideration on 15.09.2022, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence the case was posted to today. Today also there is no representation. Probably the prayers in this writ petition might have been infructuous. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JV JUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14499/2010 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE SMT.SHIBI U.M.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER

NO.B-2153/09/D.DIS OF THE ASSISTANT EDL.OFFICER. Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B-579/2010/ OF THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial