Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sreelekshmi S vs the District Educational Officer, Attingal

Sreelekshmi S vs The District Educational Officer, Attingal

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Dec 22, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1519008

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/21696/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sreelekshmi S

Respondent

The District Educational Officer, Attingal

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice raja vijayaraghavan v thursday, the 22nd day of december 2022 / 1st pousha, 1944 petitioner/s: sreelekshmi s aged 36 years hst (maths), panayara, varkala, thiruvananthapuram, 695304. by advs. suresh kumar kodoth k.p.antony binu respondent/s: 1 the district educational officer, attingal thiruvananthapuram-695101. 2 manager, panayara, varkala, thiruvananthapuram, 695145. 3 *addl r3 headmaster sree chithira vilasam boys higher secondary school chirayankeezhu, thiruvananthapuram [*addl r3 is impleaded as per order dated 21.12.2021] by adv advocate general office kerala smt mary beena joseph sr gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 22.12.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentwhen this writ petition was taken up, sri. suresh kumar koddoth, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that he has instructions to submit that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition. in view of the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- raja vijayaraghavan v judge avs appendix of wp(c) 21696/2021 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of appointment order dated 15.7.2021. exhibit p2 true copy of order dated 21.9.2021 issued by 1st respondent declining approval. exhibit p3 true copy of the judgment dated 6.8.2019 in wp(c) no.18792/2019. exhibit p4 true copy of order dated 24.9.2019 issued by 1st respondent. exhibit p5 true copy of representation dated 9.6.2020 before deputy director of education. exhibit p6 true copy of representation dated 19.8.2020. exhibit p7 true copy of representation dated 26.7.2021. respondent exhibits exhibit r1(a) true copy of the order no. b6/3654/2021/deo on 04.12.2021 issued by the district educational officer, attingal exhibit r1(b) true copy of the report of the headmaster, scvbhs, chirayinkeezhu, no. 102/2021-22 dated 18.10.2021

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 1ST POUSHA, 1944 PETITIONER/S: SREELEKSHMI S AGED 36 YEARS HST (MATHS), PANAYARA, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, 695304. BY ADVS. SURESH KUMAR KODOTH K.P.ANTONY BINU RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ATTINGAL THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695101. 2 MANAGER, PANAYARA, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, 695145. 3 *ADDL R3 HEADMASTER SREE CHITHIRA VILASAM BOYS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL CHIRAYANKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM [*ADDL R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 21.12.2021] BY ADV ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA SMT MARY BEENA JOSEPH SR GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition was taken up, Sri. Suresh Kumar Koddoth, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that he has instructions to submit that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition. In view of the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE avs APPENDIX OF WP(C) 21696/2021 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 15.7.2021. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 21.9.2021 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT DECLINING APPROVAL. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 6.8.2019 IN WP(C) NO.18792/2019. Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 24.9.2019 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT. Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 9.6.2020 BEFORE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION. Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 19.8.2020. Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 26.7.2021. RESPONDENT EXHIBITS Exhibit R1(a) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. B6/3654/2021/DEO ON 04.12.2021 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ATTINGAL Exhibit R1(b) TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE HEADMASTER, SCVBHS, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, NO. 102/2021-22 DATED 18.10.2021

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial