Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Sampathkumar Vs The Tahsildar

Sampathkumar vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 20, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1517816

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/998/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sampathkumar

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

.....the boundaries. the said undertaking given by the petitioner is recorded.4. no prejudice would be caused to the respondents if a direction is issuedto the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner for survey and demarcation of boundaries once an application is filed through online by the petitioner, seeking for survey and demarcation of boundaries.5. this court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.6. for the foregoing reasons, this court directs the petitioner to submit afresh online application with the first respondent, seeking for survey and demarcation of boundaries for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. on receipt of the said application within the stipulated time, the first respondent shall survey and demarcation the boundaries for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition after giving notice to the neighbouring land owners as well as any other third party whom the first respondent deems it fit to enquire. the said exercise shall be completed by the first respondent within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the online application from the petitioner.7. accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. no costs. index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no ab to 1.the tahsildar abdul quddhose j. ab

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20-01-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

1. Sampathkumar Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Tahsildar

Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 1st Respondent to conduct a fresh survey for the land with survey No.389/9 and give correct measurement of the land and to pass. For Petitioner(s): M/S.E.HARINI FOR M/s.R.Abirami For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For Respondent

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking for survey and demarcation of the boundaries for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. Mr. R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice

on behalf of the respondents and would submit that the petitioner will have to submit an online application with the respondents to enable them to consider the request for survey and demarcation of boundaries.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions would submit that

the petitioner shall submit a fresh online application with the respondents, seeking for survey and demarcation of the boundaries. The said undertaking given by the petitioner is recorded.

4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if a direction is issued

to the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner for survey and demarcation of boundaries once an application is filed through online by the petitioner, seeking for survey and demarcation of boundaries.

5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.

6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the petitioner to submit a

fresh online application with the first respondent, seeking for survey and demarcation of boundaries for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the said application within the stipulated time, the first respondent shall survey and demarcation the boundaries for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition after giving notice to the neighbouring land owners as well as any other third party whom the first respondent deems it fit to enquire. The said exercise shall be completed by the first respondent within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the online application from the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The Tahsildar ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Sampathkumar vs The Tahsildar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales