Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ravikumar M D vs State of Karnataka

Ravikumar M D vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Feb 27, 2026
~5 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1513427

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/768/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ravikumar M D

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....the police in the investigation and abide by any conditions to be imposed by this court. there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners. the offences alleged against thepetitioners are not punishable either with death or imprisonment for life.7. considering the above aspects, the petitioners have made out case for grant of anticipatory bail with conditions. in the result, the following: -6-orderthe petition is allowed. the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest, in crime no.466/2025 of bagalagunte police station, subject to following conditions:(i) petitioners shall voluntarily appear before theinvestigating officer within 15 days from this day and execute a bail bond for a sum of rs.1,00,000/- each, with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the io.(ii) petitioners shall appear before the io whenever called for and co-operate for investigation.(iii) petitioners shall not directly or indirectlymake any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. -7-(iv) petitioners shall appear before the io on 1st and 03rd sunday of every month for a period of one month between 10.00 a.m. and 02.00 p.m. or till filing of final report, whichever is earlier. sd/- (shivashankar amarannavar) judge dkb list no.: 1 sl no.: 27 ct.sm

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION No. 768 OF 2026 (438(Cr.PC) / 482(BNSS)) BETWEEN:

1. RAVIKUMAR M D AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS SON OF DWARAKANATH CURRENTLY RESIDING AT No. 796, FIRST FLOOR, 36TH A CROSS 18TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR, 4TH T BLOCK BENGALURU - 560 041.

2. ABHISHEK EMMANUEL T.,

SON OF KISHORE BABU TADIKONDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS CURRENTLY RESIDING AT FLAT No. F-1401 Digitally signed by MANTRI TRANQUIL APARTMENT LAKSHMINARAYANA KANAKAPURA ROAD, GUBBALALA MURTHY RAJASHRI BENGALURU - 560 061. Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ASHWIN RADHAKRISHNAN, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY BAGALAGUNTE POLICE STATION BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY -2- STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI M R PATIL, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 Cr.P.C (FILED UNDER SECTION 482 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE BNS 2023 IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN FIR IN CRIME No.466/2025 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 316(1),318,351(3),351(1),351(2),318(4) OF BNS 2023 REGISTERED BY THE BAGALAGUNTE POLICE STATION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed by accused Nos.1 and 2 under Section 482 of BNSS praying to grant anticipatory bail in Crime No.466/2025 of Bagalagunte Police Station, registered for offences under Sections 316(1), 318, 351(3), 351(1), 351(2) and 318(4) of BNS, 2023.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned HCGP for respondent/State. -3-

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would contend that there was MOU between petitioners and the

complainant dated 20.08.2020 under which the complainant has invested Rs.1 Crore in the company of the petitioners. It is alleged that the said amount is not paid and cheque has been issued. The said cheque has been dishonoured and case under Section 138 of the N.I.Act has been filed against the petitioners and it is pending consideration. After lapse of 2 years of dishonour of cheque, the petitioners with similar allegations has filed PCR No.14131/2024. The amount paid by the complainant to the petitioners is subjudice in the cheque dishonour case. The petitioners are ready to co-operate with the IO in the investigation and abide by any terms and conditions to be imposed by this Court. The offences alleged against the petitioners are not punishable either with death or imprisonment for life. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners. With this he prayed to allow the petition.

-4-

4. Per contra, learned HCGP would contend that under MOU the petitioners have received Rs.1 Crore from

the complainant agreeing to repay the same. The petitioners have issued a cheque for repaying the said amount and the said cheque came to be dishonored. The petitioners have cheated the complainant. The petitioners are required for custodial interrogation. With this, he prayed to reject the petition.

5. Having heard the learned counsels, the Court has perused the complaint and other materials placed on record.

6. The complainant has filed a PCR No.14131/2024

against the petitioners. The said complaint came to be referred to police for investigation. The police registered Crime No.466/2025 based on the said private complaint in Bagalgunte Police Station for the aforesaid offences. The averments of the said complaint indicate that the complainant has invested Rs.1 Crore in the company of the petitioners under MOU dated 02.08.2020. It is alleged -5-

that the petitioners have not repaid the said amount and cheated the complainant. The complainant had already filed proceedings for offence under Section 138 of the N.I.Act, as the cheque issued by the petitioners has been dishonoured and it is stated to be pending at final stage. Considering the averments of the present complaint, at this stage, it can be said that the dispute between petitioners and the complainant is of civil nature. The petitioners have undertaken to co-operate with the police in the investigation and abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. There are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners. The offences alleged against the

petitioners are not punishable either with death or imprisonment for life.

7. Considering the above aspects, the petitioners have made out case for grant of anticipatory bail with conditions. In the result, the following: -6-

ORDER

The petition is allowed. The petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest, in Crime No.466/2025 of Bagalagunte Police Station, subject to following conditions:

(i) Petitioners shall voluntarily appear before the

Investigating Officer within 15 days from this day and execute a bail bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each, with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the IO.

(ii) Petitioners shall appear before the IO whenever called for and co-operate for investigation.

(iii) Petitioners shall not directly or indirectly

make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. -7-

(iv) Petitioners shall appear before the IO on 1st and 03rd Sunday of every Month for a period of one month between 10.00 a.m. and 02.00 p.m. or till filing of final report, whichever is earlier. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27 Ct.sm

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial