Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pramod vs State of Kerala

Pramod vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 28, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1508181

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./5986/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pramod

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....on 11.01.2022 at 3.00 p.m., the accused was found transporting 11.300kilograms of hashish oil in a ksrtc stage carriage bearing reg.no.kl-15-a-958 in contravention of the provisions of the ndps act and thus the accusedcommitted the above said offence.4. petitioner submits that he was arrested on 11.01.2022 and is in custody since then. though he moved an application for bail before the sessions court, the same was rejected as per annexure-a2. b.a. no. 5986 of 2022 35. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned public prosecutor.6. learned public prosecutor seriously opposed the application for bail mainly contending that the contraband involved is 11.300 kilograms of hashish oil and it was seized from the possession of the petitioner. considering the facts and circumstances of the caseand the nature of the allegations, and the contraband involved is a commercial quantity whereby the rigour of section 37 of the ndps act will come into play, i am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. considering the fact that the case is pending before the trial court, there will be a direction to the trial court to expedite the trial of the case and to finalise the same without much delay. accordingly, the bail application is dismissed. sd/- viju abraham, judge pm

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1944 BAIL APPL. NO. 5986 OF 2022 PETITIONER/ACCUSED: PRAMOD AGED 31 YEARS KOZHITHARA HOUSE,ELAMKUNNAPUZHA,NJRACKAL,ERNAKULAM, PIN - BY ADV K.SIMOD SIVAN RESPONDENTS/STATE: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 2 EXCISE INSPECTOR EXCISE ENFORCEMENT AND ANTI NARCOTIC SPECIAL SQUAD ,PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001 BY ADVS. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION(AG-11) OTHER PRESENT: SR.PP - SRI. C.K.SURESH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: B.A. No. 5986 of 2022 2

VIJU ABRAHAM, J.

------------------------ B.A. No. 5986 of 2022 ------------------------------ Dated this the 28th day of October, 2022

ORDER

This is an application for regular bail.

2. Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.1 of 2022 of Excise Enforcement and Anti Narcotic Special Squad, Palakkad now pending as SC No.471 of 2022 before the Sessions Court-IV, Palakkad, registered alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii) (C)of NDPS Act.

3. The prosecution allegation is that, on 11.01.2022 at 3.00 p.m., the accused was found transporting 11.300

kilograms       of    Hashish   Oil    in     a    KSRTC     stage    carriage
bearing     Reg.No.KL-15-A-958           in        contravention      of   the
provisions       of    the    NDPS     Act        and    thus   the    accused

committed the above said offence.

4. Petitioner submits that he was arrested on 11.01.2022 and is in custody since then. Though he moved an application for bail before the Sessions Court, the same was rejected as per Annexure-A2. B.A. No. 5986 of 2022 3

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

6. Learned Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the application for bail mainly contending that the contraband involved is 11.300 kilograms of hashish oil and it was seized from the possession of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

and the nature of the allegations, and the contraband involved is a commercial quantity whereby the rigour of Section 37 of the NDPS Act will come into play, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Considering the fact that the case is pending before the trial court, there will be a direction to the trial court to expedite the trial of the case and to finalise the same without much delay. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed. sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM, JUDGE pm

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial