The Divisional Manager vs Naganna

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Kalaburagi Decided Jan 19, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1508092

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1508092
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi High Court
Judge: C M Joshi
Decided On: Jan 19, 2026
Case Number: RP/200036/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Divisional Manager

Respondent

Naganna

Excerpt

.....for respondent no. 2.2. ia no.1/2025 is allowed by accepting the reasons stated in the affidavit accompanying the application and delay of 07 days in filing the petition is condoned.2. this matter is arising out of mfa no.201263/2021 (filed against judgment in eca no.3. this court in the judgment dated 26.04.2025 inmfa no.201263/2021 had calculated the compensation in -3- para 15. it is noticed that an arithmetic error had crept in. this court after noticing in para 11 that the government of india had issued a notification under section 4(1-b) wherein it prescribed a sum of rs.8,000/- as monthly wages, calculated the compensation of rs.2,39,232/-. while calculating, this court had added 60% to the sum of rs.8,000/- and then multiplied the same by disability and by factor applicable. therefore, it is an arithmetical error which has crept in. hence, the calculation in para 15 is rectified as below:"15. as a consequence, the compensation is recalculated as rs.8,000/- x 60% x 10% x 186.9=rs.89,712/-."4. the medical bills worth rs.67,600/- wereproduced and awarded by the commissioner and the same is confirmed. therefore, para 16 is also corrected to read as below. in effect, the total amount entitled by the petitioner would be rs.1,57,312/- instead of -4- rs.1,14,700/-. to that effect, corrections to be carried out in the judgment of this court.4. review petition is disposed of accordingly. sd/- (c m joshi) judge tsn* list no.: 19 sl no.: 2

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI REVIEW PETITION NO. 200036 OF 2025 BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., 1ST FLOOR, SANGAMESHWAR COLONY, KALABURAGI - 585 102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAHUL R ASTURE, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. NAGANNA S/O DHULAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: OWNER OF TRUCK, R/O BELUR (J), Digitally signed TQ. AND DIST. KALABURAGI - 585 101. by NANDINI R Location: HIGH COURT OF 2. MANIK @ MANIKAPPA, KARNATAKA S/O SHARANAPPA GOLLUR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC: CLEANER OF TRUCK, NOW NIL, R/O BELUR (J) TQ. AND DIST.KALABURAGI-585 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI BABU H METAGUDDA, ADVOCATE FOR R-2; NOTICE TO R-1 DISPENSED WITH V/O DATED 16.12.2025) -2- THIS RP IS FILED U/S. 114 R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF THE CPC, PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT TO REVIEW OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.04.2025 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN MFA NO. 201263/2021 AND CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASED TO MODIFY THE ORDER BY REDUCING THE COMPENSATION AWARDED BY THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI

ORAL ORDER

Heard learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner and the learned counsel for respondent No. 2.

2. IA No.1/2025 is allowed by accepting the reasons stated in the affidavit accompanying the application and delay of 07 days in filing the petition is condoned.

2. This matter is arising out of MFA No.201263/2021 (filed against judgment in ECA No.

3. This Court in the judgment dated 26.04.2025 in

MFA No.201263/2021 had calculated the compensation in -3- para 15. It is noticed that an arithmetic error had crept in. This Court after noticing in para 11 that the Government of India had issued a Notification under Section 4(1-B) wherein it prescribed a sum of Rs.8,000/- as monthly wages, calculated the compensation of Rs.2,39,232/-. While calculating, this Court had added 60% to the sum of Rs.8,000/- and then multiplied the same by disability and by factor applicable. Therefore, it is an arithmetical error which has crept in. Hence, the calculation in para 15 is rectified as below:

"15. As a consequence, the compensation is recalculated as Rs.8,000/- x 60% x 10% x 186.9=Rs.89,712/-."

4. The medical bills worth Rs.67,600/- were

produced and awarded by the Commissioner and the same is confirmed. Therefore, para 16 is also corrected to read as below. In effect, the total amount entitled by the petitioner would be Rs.1,57,312/- instead of -4- Rs.1,14,700/-. To that effect, corrections to be carried out in the judgment of this court.

4. Review petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE tsn* List No.: 19 Sl No.: 2

Same Court & Year Karnataka Kalaburagi · 2026 Same Parties The Divisional Manager vs Naganna Same Judge C M Joshi