Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shankramma vs the State

Shankramma vs The State

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Orders Decided Feb 03, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1508090

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P/200575/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shankramma

Respondent

The State

Excerpt

-1- in the high court of karnataka kalaburagi bench dated this the 3rd day of february, 2026 before the hon'ble mr. justice v srishananda criminal petition no. 200575 of 2024 (439(2)(cr.pc)/483(3)(bnss) ) between: shankramma d/o mallanna reddy age 34 years occ. household, r/o. aganur tq. surpur now maka layout, jewargi colony kalabruagi-585103. …petitioner (by sri. liyaqat fareed ustad, advocate) and:1. the state through city women, ashok nagar ps, police station, represented by addl spp, high court of karnataka at kalaburagi-585107.digitally signed by chandrashekar 2. ragahavendra reddy s/o. jaganath reddy laxman kattimani age: 36 years, occ: medical shop at yadgir, location: high r/o. ramtheerth, court of karnataka, dharwad bench tq. chittapur, dist. kolaburgi-585211. …respondentthis criminal petition is filed under section 439(ii) of cr.p.c., praying to reject the bail order dated 10.02.2023, in criminal petition no.201314/2022 and arrest the accused in crim no.0132/2023 for the offences punishable u/sec.376(2)(n) 506, 504, 109 r/w. 34 of ipc of city women ps, kalaburgi, in the interest of justice.this petition, coming on for orders, this day, orderwas made therein as under: -2-oral order(per: the hon'ble mr. justice v.srishananda) none appears for the petitioner. petition is filed under section 439(2) of cr.p.c. seeking cancellation of the bail already granted. despite granting sufficient time, office objections are not complied. taking note of the same, petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- (v srishananda) judge kav ct-cmu list no.: 19 sl no.: 1

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200575 OF 2024 (439(2)(CR.PC)/483(3)(BNSS) ) BETWEEN: SHANKRAMMA D/O MALLANNA REDDY AGE 34 YEARS OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. AGANUR TQ. SURPUR NOW MAKA LAYOUT, JEWARGI COLONY KALABRUAGI-585103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LIYAQAT FAREED USTAD, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE STATE THROUGH CITY WOMEN, ASHOK NAGAR PS, POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY ADDL SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT KALABURAGI-585107.

Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR 2. RAGAHAVENDRA REDDY S/O. JAGANATH REDDY LAXMAN KATTIMANI AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: MEDICAL SHOP AT YADGIR, Location: High R/O. RAMTHEERTH, Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench TQ. CHITTAPUR, DIST. KOLABURGI-585211. …RESPONDENT

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439(II) OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO REJECT THE BAIL ORDER DATED 10.02.2023, IN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.201314/2022 AND ARREST THE ACCUSED IN CRIM NO.0132/2023 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SEC.376(2)(n) 506, 504, 109 R/W. 34 OF IPC OF CITY WOMEN PS, KALABURGI, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER

WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: -2-

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) None appears for the petitioner. Petition is filed under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C. seeking cancellation of the bail already granted. Despite granting sufficient time, office objections are not complied. Taking note of the same, petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV CT-CMU LIST NO.: 19 SL NO.: 1

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial