Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Mr. Loganathan, Vs Thiru. P.N.Sridhar, I.A.S., and 3 others

Mr. Loganathan, vs Thiru. P.N.Sridhar, I.A.S., and 3 others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 30, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1503248

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CONT P/141/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr. Loganathan,

Respondent

Thiru. P.N.Sridhar, I.A.S., and 3 others

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30.01.2026coram:the honourable mr. justice m.dhandapani loganathan ... petitioner vs.1. thiru p.n.sridhar, ias, commissioner, hindu religious & charitable endowment department, no.119, uttamar gandhi salai, nungambakkam, chennai-34.2. tmt.v.sabarmathi, b.l. joint commissioner, hr & ce kottaimari amman temple campus,3. thiru k.raja, ma.b.ed., assistant commissioner hr & ce, arulmigu kottai mariamman temple camous,4. thiru matheswaran the fit person, arulmigu velayuthasamy temple, vattamalai, katheri village, sankagiri taluk, salem district. ... respondentcontempt petition filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience to the order of this court in wp.no.34136 of 2025 dated 08.09.2025 passed by this court. for petitioner : mr.b.jagannath for respondent : mr.k.karthikeyan, gam.dhandapani.,j.rliorderthis contempt petition is filed seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience to the order of this court in wp.no.34136 of 2025 dated 08.09.2025 passed by this court.2. the petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order of appointmentof the trustees. however, this court vide its order dated 08.09.2025 disposed the writ petition by directing the respondents to consider the applications for appointment of the trustees, shall be decided subject to the result of oa.no.15 of 2020, which was filed for modification of the scheme in oa.no.16 of 2001.3. recording the same, the contempt petition is closed accordingly. 30.01.2026 index : yes/no speaking order : yes/no rli

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.01.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Loganathan ... Petitioner vs.

1. Thiru P.N.Sridhar, IAS, Commissioner, Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment Department, No.119, Uttamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.

2. Tmt.V.Sabarmathi, B.L. Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Kottaimari Amman Temple Campus,

3. Thiru K.Raja, MA.B.Ed., Assistant Commissioner HR & CE, Arulmigu Kottai Mariamman Temple Camous,

4. Thiru Matheswaran The Fit Person, Arulmigu Velayuthasamy Temple, Vattamalai, Katheri Village, Sankagiri Taluk, Salem District. ... Respondent

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the Respondents for willful disobedience to the order of this Court in WP.No.34136 of 2025 dated 08.09.2025 passed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Jagannath For Respondent : Mr.K.Karthikeyan, GA

M.DHANDAPANI.,J.

rli

ORDER

This Contempt Petition is filed seeking to punish the Respondents for willful disobedience to the order of this Court in WP.No.34136 of 2025 dated 08.09.2025 passed by this Court.

2. The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order of appointment

of the Trustees. However, this Court vide its order dated 08.09.2025 disposed the writ petition by directing the respondents to consider the applications for appointment of the Trustees, shall be decided subject to the result of OA.No.15 of 2020, which was filed for modification of the scheme in OA.No.16 of 2001.

3. Recording the same, the Contempt Petition is closed accordingly. 30.01.2026 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No rli

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Mr. Loganathan, vs Thiru. P.N.Sridhar, I.A.S., and 3 others Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales