Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Hamsa V.M. vs Jayakumar

Hamsa V.M. vs Jayakumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 06, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1502089

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/1356/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hamsa V.M.

Respondent

Jayakumar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice murali purushothaman thursday, the 6th day of october 2022 / 14th aswina, 1944 con.case(c) no. 1356 of 2022 against the judgment dated 08.03.2022 in wp(c) 7539/2022 petitioner/s: hamsa v.m., aged 51 years s/o muhammed, veliyath house. kumbamkallu, elamdesam, thodupuzha taluk, idukki district. now residing at vellyath house, edavetty p.o. marthoma. thodupuzha taluk, idukki district, pin - 685587 by advs. k.r.sunil krishna suresh danic antony respondent/s: jayakumar father's name and age not known to the petitioner, the deputy tahsildar, thodupuzha taluk. thodupuzha p.o. idukki district, pin - 685587 by gp sri.symanthak this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 06.10.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: con.case(c) no. 1356 of 2022 ..2..judgmentthe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the contempt of court case without prejudice to his right to challenge the action of the respondent in appropriate proceedings. the contempt of court case is closed accordingly with liberty as above. sd/- murali purushothaman judge sb/06/10/2022 con.case(c) no. 1356 of 2022 ..3.. appendix petitioner annexures annexure a1 the certified copy of the judgement dated 08.03.2022 in w.p.(c) no.7539/2022. annexure a2 the true copy of the receipt dated 30.03.2022 issued by the special village officer karikode village office, thodupuzha annexure a3 the true copy of the receipt issued by the office, thodupuzha dated 30.04.2022 annexure a4 the true copy of the receipt issued by the office, thodupuzha dated 28.05.2022. annexure a5 the true copy of the letter dated 05.04.2022 sent by the petitioner to the assistant executive engineer, kseb, thodupuzha annexure a6 the true copy of the reply letter sent by the assistant executive engineer, kseb thodupuzha dated 02.06.2022

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 14TH ASWINA, 1944 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1356 OF 2022 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 08.03.2022 in WP(C) 7539/2022 PETITIONER/S: HAMSA V.M., AGED 51 YEARS S/O MUHAMMED, VELIYATH HOUSE. KUMBAMKALLU, ELAMDESAM, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT. NOW RESIDING AT VELLYATH HOUSE, EDAVETTY P.O. MARTHOMA. THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685587 BY ADVS. K.R.SUNIL KRISHNA SURESH DANIC ANTONY RESPONDENT/S: JAYAKUMAR FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, THODUPUZHA TALUK. THODUPUZHA P.O. IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685587 BY GP SRI.SYMANTHAK THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CON.CASE(C) NO. 1356 OF 2022 ..2..

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the contempt of court case without prejudice to his right to challenge the action of the respondent in appropriate proceedings. The contempt of court case is closed accordingly with liberty as above. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SB/06/10/2022 CON.CASE(C) NO. 1356 OF 2022 ..3.. APPENDIX PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DATED 08.03.2022 IN W.P.(C) NO.7539/2022. Annexure A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 30.03.2022 ISSUED BY THE SPECIAL VILLAGE OFFICER KARIKODE VILLAGE OFFICE, THODUPUZHA Annexure A3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE OFFICE, THODUPUZHA DATED 30.04.2022 Annexure A4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE OFFICE, THODUPUZHA DATED 28.05.2022. Annexure A5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 05.04.2022 SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB, THODUPUZHA Annexure A6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY LETTER SENT BY THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSEB THODUPUZHA DATED 02.06.2022

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2022 Same Parties Hamsa V.M. vs Jayakumar Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Murali Purushothaman

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales