SARAVANAKUMAR Vs The Inspector of Police

Saravanakumar vs The Inspector of Police

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 10, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1496202

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1496202
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
Decided On: Jun 10, 2026
Case Number: WP Crl./1375/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Saravanakumar

Respondent

The Inspector of Police

Excerpt

.....period. for petitioner(s): mr.g.nareshkumar for respondent(s): mr.r.ganesh kumar, counsel for government of tamil nadu (criminal side) for rr1 to 3 mr.v.nicholas for rr4 to 6orderthis writ petition is filed seeking for a direction directing the 1st respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner while fencing his property comprised in s.no.105/6b1 measuring to an extent of 0.20.0 hectares and s.no.105/5d2 measuring to an extent of 0.10.0 hectares situated at thorappalli village, shoolagiri taluk, krishnagiri district, as per the survey conducted by the 2nd respondent on 21.08.2025, by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 15.10.2025 within a stipulated period. 2.heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. page2 of 4 3.considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the first respondent is directed to conduct an enquiry after issuing a notice to the petitioner as will as the respondents 4 to 6 and to take appropriate action on the representation made by the petitioner dated 15.10.2025, in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4.the writ petition (criminal) is disposed of accordingly. no costs. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no tsg to4. the public prosecutor, madras high court. page3 of 4g.k.ilanthiraiyan, j.tsg page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10-06-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Saravanakumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs
4. Narayana S/o.Chinna Bheemanna
5. Komaramma W/o.Narayana
6. Gandhamma D/o.Chinna Bhemanna ..Respondent(s)
Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 st respondent to provide adequate police protection while fencing the property comprised in Page1 of 4 S.No.105/6B1 measuring to an extent of 0.20.0 hectares and S.No.105/5D2 measuring to an extent of 0.10.0 hectares situated at Thorappalli Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District, as per the survey conducted by the 2 nd respondent on 21.08.2025 by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 15.10.2025 within a stipulated period. For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Nareshkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar, Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for RR1 to 3 Mr.V.Nicholas for RR4 to 6

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed seeking for a direction directing the 1st respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner while fencing his property comprised in S.No.105/6B1 measuring to an extent of 0.20.0 hectares and S.No.105/5D2 measuring to an extent of 0.10.0 hectares situated at Thorappalli Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District, as per the survey conducted by the 2nd respondent on 21.08.2025, by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 15.10.2025 within a stipulated period. 2.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. Page2 of 4 3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the first respondent is directed to conduct an enquiry after issuing a notice to the petitioner as will as the respondents 4 to 6 and to take appropriate action on the representation made by the petitioner dated 15.10.2025, in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4.The Writ Petition (Criminal) is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No TSG To

4. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. Page3 of 4

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

TSG Page4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Saravanakumar vs The Inspector of Police Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan