Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rahul vs State of Kerala

RAHUL vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 22, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1493572

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./4894/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

RAHUL

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice viju abraham friday, the 22nd day of july 2022 / 31st ashadha, 1944 bail appl. no. 4894 of 2022 petitioner/accused: rahul, aged 28 years aged 28 years, s/o mohanan, manjakat house, kololomba p.o, malappuram , pin - 679576 by advs. prasun.s a.kumar g.mini(1748) p.s.sree prasad n.a.retheesh respondent/complainant/state: state of kerala represented by the public prosecutor high court of kerala, ernakulam representing the sales tax officer (ib),goods and service tax department, thrissur pin - 682031other present: spl.gp for taxes - sri. mohammed rafiq this bail application having come up for admission on 22.07.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: b.a. no. 3893 of 2022 2viju abraham, j.----------------------- b.a. no. 4894 of 2022 ------------------------------ dated this the 22nd day of july, 2022orderthis is an application for anticipatory bail.2. when the matter was taken up for considerationtoday, the learned special government pleader for tax submits that the petitioner is not made an accused in file no.ins-08/2021-23(3) of the state goods and tax department, thrissur. learned special public prosecutor upon instructions submitted that a bailable warrant was issued by the jfcm court, thrissur only due to the non appearance of the petitioner before the authorities and it is for the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional magistrate and seek for bail. recording the above submission, anticipatory bail application is closed. sd/- viju abraham, judge pm

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2022 / 31ST ASHADHA, 1944 BAIL APPL. NO. 4894 OF 2022 PETITIONER/ACCUSED: RAHUL, AGED 28 YEARS AGED 28 YEARS, S/O MOHANAN, MANJAKAT HOUSE, KOLOLOMBA P.O, MALAPPURAM , PIN - 679576 BY ADVS. PRASUN.S A.KUMAR G.MINI(1748) P.S.SREE PRASAD N.A.RETHEESH RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT/STATE: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTING THE SALES TAX OFFICER (IB),GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THRISSUR PIN - 682031

OTHER PRESENT: SPL.GP FOR TAXES - SRI. MOHAMMED RAFIQ THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: B.A. No. 3893 of 2022 2

VIJU ABRAHAM, J.

----------------------- B.A. No. 4894 of 2022 ------------------------------ Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2022

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail.

2. When the matter was taken up for consideration

today, the learned Special Government Pleader for Tax submits that the petitioner is not made an accused in File No.INS-08/2021-23(3) of the State Goods and Tax Department, Thrissur. Learned Special Public Prosecutor upon instructions submitted that a bailable warrant was issued by the JFCM Court, Thrissur only due to the non appearance of the petitioner before the authorities and it is for the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate and seek for bail. Recording the above submission, anticipatory bail application is closed. sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM, JUDGE pm

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial