Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

S. Malar vs the Tahsildar

S. Malar vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 07, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1493514

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/42308/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S. Malar

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

.....is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner’s property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party and the 4 th respondent as they deem fit. accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:- page no.2 of 4(a) before surveying the lands in question, the 2nd respondent is directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, 4th respondent and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice.(b) after receiving objections if any and afterconsidering the same, the 2nd respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, with the assistance of 3rd respondent, if required, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.(c) there shall be no order as to costs. index : yes / nospeaking order / non-speaking orderneutral citation case : yes/no sp to pethanaickenpalayam taluk,salem district. pethanaickenpalayam taluk, salem district. page no.3 of 4abdul quddhose, j.sp page no.4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.01.2026

CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.Malar ... Petitioner Vs. 4.S.Soundarm ... Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to depute a competent surveyor to make survey to the petitioner’s land in Survey No.162/1 of Thumbal Village, which is situated at Pethanaickenpalayam Taluk, Salem District, with the aid of the 3rd respondent, to give police protection on the day of surveying the petitioner’s land within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court.

Page No.1 of 4 For Petitioner : Mr.R.Naresh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Arumugam Government Advocate [R1 & R2] Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Government Advocate (Crl.Side) [R3] Mr.R.Selvabharathi [R4] *****

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by her, based on her application, dated 18.08.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner had submitted an application on 18.08.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered by the respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the 2nd

respondent is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner’s property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party and the 4 th respondent as they deem fit. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:- Page No.2 of 4

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the 2nd respondent is directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners, 4th respondent and also to any other party, if they deem fit to put on notice.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after

considering the same, the 2nd respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, with the assistance of 3rd respondent, if required, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) There shall be no order as to costs. Index : Yes / No

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp To Pethanaickenpalayam Taluk,Salem District. Pethanaickenpalayam Taluk, Salem District. Page No.3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

sp Page No.4 of 4

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties S. Malar vs The Tahsildar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales