Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sivadasan vs Latha Sivadasan

Sivadasan vs Latha Sivadasan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 27, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1493460

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RPFC/375/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sivadasan

Respondent

Latha Sivadasan

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a. badharudeen thursday, the 27th day of october 2022 / 5th karthika, against the order in mc 172/2014 dated 11.02.2016 rendered in common judgment in o.p.no.1405 of 2013 and m.c.no.172 of 2014 of family court, thrissur revision petitioner/respondent : sivadasan, aged 50 years, s/o.late kottiyattil velayudhan, kottiyattil, nedupuzha desom, kanimangalam village, thrissur taluk, pin-680 007. by advs. sri.p.m.manoj sri.v.r.arun sri.p.anto thomas sri.s.russel respondent/petitioner & state : 1 latha sivadasan, aged 46 years, w/o.sivadasan, kottiyattil, nedupuzha desom, kanimangalam village, thrissur taluk, pin-680 007. by adv sri.dilip j. akkara this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 27.10.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: -:2:-a.badharudeen, j.r.p.(fc)no.375 of 2016 dated this the 27th day of october, 2022orderit is submitted by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner that the matter has been settled and this revision petition is not intended to be proceeded. no representation for the other side. acting on the submission, this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. hence, the interim order of stay stands vacated. registry is directed to forward a copy of thisorder to the court below concerned for information andcompliance. sd/- a. badharudeen judge rkj

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 5TH KARTHIKA, AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC 172/2014 DATED 11.02.2016 RENDERED IN COMMON JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.1405 OF 2013 AND M.C.NO.172 OF 2014 OF FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT : SIVADASAN, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.LATE KOTTIYATTIL VELAYUDHAN, KOTTIYATTIL, NEDUPUZHA DESOM, KANIMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK, PIN-680 007. BY ADVS. SRI.P.M.MANOJ SRI.V.R.ARUN SRI.P.ANTO THOMAS SRI.S.RUSSEL RESPONDENT/PETITIONER & STATE : 1 LATHA SIVADASAN, AGED 46 YEARS, W/O.SIVADASAN, KOTTIYATTIL, NEDUPUZHA DESOM, KANIMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK, PIN-680 007. BY ADV SRI.DILIP J. AKKARA THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:2:-

A.BADHARUDEEN, J.

R.P.(FC)No.375 of 2016 Dated this the 27th day of October, 2022

ORDER

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner that the matter has been settled and this revision petition is not intended to be proceeded. No representation for the other side. Acting on the submission, this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Hence, the interim order of stay stands vacated. Registry is directed to forward a copy of this

order to the court below concerned for information and

compliance. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE rkj

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial