Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

A.Rajendran vs M.Nanda Kumar

A.Rajendran vs M.Nanda Kumar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 02, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1492889

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/31937/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.Rajendran

Respondent

M.Nanda Kumar

Excerpt

c.m.p.no.31937 of 2025 in cma.sr.no.170957 of 2025n.sathish kumar., j.andr.sakthivel., j.(order of the court was made by n.sathish kumar.j.,) the petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 27 days in filing the above appeal.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the fourth respondent.3. being satisfied with the reasonsstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 27 days in filing the appeal is condoned. it is made clear that in the event, the petitioner succeeds in the appeal, he will not be entitled to any interest for the period of delay.4. registry is directed to number the appeal, if the papers are otherwise inorder.[n.s.k.,j.] [r.s.v.,j.] 02.02.2026 dhk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.No.31937 of 2025 in CMA.SR.No.170957 of 2025

N.SATHISH KUMAR., J.

and

R.SAKTHIVEL., J.

(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR.J.,) The petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 27 days in filing the above appeal.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the fourth respondent.

3. Being satisfied with the reasons

stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 27 days in filing the appeal is condoned. It is made clear that in the event, the petitioner succeeds in the appeal, he will not be entitled to any interest for the period of delay.

4. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if the papers are otherwise in

order.

[N.S.K.,J.] [R.S.V.,J.] 02.02.2026 dhk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties A.Rajendran vs M.Nanda Kumar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar,Honourable Mr.Justice ...

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales