E.Lakshmanan vs Kalaiselvi Mohan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 20, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1492591

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1492591
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice S. M. Subramaniam
Decided On: Feb 20, 2026
Case Number: CONT P/66/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

E.Lakshmanan

Respondent

Kalaiselvi Mohan

Excerpt

2026:mhc:855in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 20-02-2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice s. m. subramaniam e.lakshmanan ..petitioner(s) vs ..contemnor(s) contempt petition filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act to punish the respondents herein under the provision of the contempt of court's act for willful disobedience of the judgement or orders of this court for petitioner(s): mr.d.s.ramesh for contemnor(s): mr.d.ravichander special government pleader page1 of 4orderthe present contempt petition has been instituted to punish the respondents herein for their willful disobedience of the order of this court2. learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that an enquiry has been conducted by the respondents.3. learned special government pleader would submit that during thecourse of enquiry, petitioner requested for correction of udr, which cannot be done by the tahsildar, and such correction must go to the revenue divisional officer. therefore, tahsildar has forwarded the application to the revenue divisional officer. petitioner is at liberty to approach the revenue divisional officer for passing appropriate orders.3. granting above liberty, the contempt petition is closed. no costs. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no gd page2 of 4 to page3 of 4s.m.subramaniam, j.gd page4 of 4

Full Judgment

2026:MHC:855
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20-02-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM E.Lakshmanan ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Contemnor(s) Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein under the provision of the Contempt of Court's Act for willful disobedience of the judgement or orders of this court For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.S.Ramesh For Contemnor(s): Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader Page1 of 4

ORDER

The present contempt petition has been instituted to punish the respondents herein for their willful disobedience of the order of this Court

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that an enquiry has been conducted by the respondents.

3. Learned Special Government Pleader would submit that during the

course of enquiry, petitioner requested for correction of UDR, which cannot be done by the Tahsildar, and such correction must go to the Revenue Divisional Officer. Therefore, Tahsildar has forwarded the application to the Revenue Divisional Officer. Petitioner is at liberty to approach the Revenue Divisional Officer for passing appropriate orders.

3. Granting above liberty, the contempt petition is closed. No costs. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No GD Page2 of 4 To Page3 of 4

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

GD Page4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties E.Lakshmanan vs Kalaiselvi Mohan Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice S. M. Subramaniam