Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Krishnan Vs Parvathi

Krishnan vs Parvathi

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1491847

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/32835/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnan

Respondent

Parvathi

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27-02-2026coramthe hon'ble mrs.justice t.v.thamilselvi and s/o. subramaniya mudaliyar, gundiyanthandalam village, cheyyar taluk, vs page1 of 4 s/o. subramaniya mudaliyar, gundiyanthandalam village, cheyyar taluk, tiruvannamalai district. vs to condone the delay of 874 days in filing the second appeal in sa sr no.165276/2025 before this honble court and pass such further or other orders as may be deemed fit and thus render justice. for appellant(s): mr.v.baskaran for respondent(s): mr.s.makesh for r1 to r4orderthis civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 874 days in filing the above s.a.s.r.165276 of 2025.2. the learned counsel for the respondent has raised objection in allowing the petition. page2 of 43. having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay of 874 days in filing the second appeal is condoned.4. accordingly, this civil miscellaneous petition is ordered. lbm to page3 of 4 t.v.thamilselvi j. lbm to and page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND S/o. Subramaniya Mudaliyar, Gundiyanthandalam Village, Cheyyar Taluk, Vs Page1 of 4 S/o. Subramaniya Mudaliyar, Gundiyanthandalam Village, Cheyyar Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. Vs To condone the delay of 874 days in filing the Second Appeal in SA SR No.165276/2025 before this Honble Court and pass such further or other orders as may be deemed fit and thus render justice. For Appellant(s): Mr.V.Baskaran For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Makesh For R1 To R4

ORDER

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 874 days in filing the above S.A.S.R.165276 of 2025.

2. The learned counsel for the respondent has raised objection in allowing the petition. Page2 of 4

3. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay of 874 days in filing the Second Appeal is condoned.

4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. Lbm To Page3 of 4 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. Lbm To AND Page4 of 4

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial