Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sajeeb vs Najuma

Sajeeb vs Najuma

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Sep 30, 2022
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1491598

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Tr.P(C)/282/2013

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sajeeb

Respondent

Najuma

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias friday, the 30th day of september 2022 / 8th aswina, 1944 against o.p nos.,134/2013, 951/2013, 910/2013 and 1326/2013 of family court, attingal petitioner/respondent s: sajeeb s/o.abdul azeez, azeez manzil, kanchira p.o., kanaykulangara, vembayam village, nedumangad taluk, thiruvananthapuram. by adv sri.basant balaji respondent/petitioner: najuma d/o.salahudeen, najuma manzil, chempumoola, mudapuram desom, azhoor village, chirayinkeezhu taluk, thiruvananthapuram - 695 314. by advs. sri.m.dinesh sri.pirappancode v.s.sudhir this transfer petition (civil) having come up for admission on 30.09.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:ordersri.pirappancode v.s.sudhir, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter in dispute between the parties has been settled. therefore, nothing further survives in this transfer petition. the said submission is recorded. the transfer petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- c.s.dias ma/30.9.2022 judge appendix of tr.p(c) 282/2013 petitioner annexures annexure a true copy of the complaint dated 04.06.2013 filed by the petitioner before the judge family court. annexure b true copy of the petition for adjournment in o.p. no. 951/2013.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 8TH ASWINA, 1944 AGAINST O.P Nos.,134/2013, 951/2013, 910/2013 and 1326/2013 OF FAMILY COURT, ATTINGAL PETITIONER/RESPONDENT S: SAJEEB S/O.ABDUL AZEEZ, AZEEZ MANZIL, KANCHIRA P.O., KANAYKULANGARA, VEMBAYAM VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV SRI.BASANT BALAJI RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: NAJUMA D/O.SALAHUDEEN, NAJUMA MANZIL, CHEMPUMOOLA, MUDAPURAM DESOM, AZHOOR VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 314. BY ADVS. SRI.M.DINESH SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.09.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Sri.Pirappancode V.S.Sudhir, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter in dispute between the parties has been settled. Therefore, nothing further survives in this transfer petition. The said submission is recorded. The transfer petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- C.S.DIAS ma/30.9.2022 JUDGE APPENDIX OF TR.P(C) 282/2013 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 04.06.2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE JUDGE FAMILY COURT. ANNEXURE B TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FOR ADJOURNMENT IN O.P. NO. 951/2013.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial