Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Balakrishnan vs Vimala

Balakrishnan vs Vimala

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 09, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1488998

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMA/999/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Balakrishnan

Respondent

Vimala

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 04.12.2024coramthe honourable mrs. justice j.nisha banu and the honourable mr. justice r.sakthivel and and c.m.p.no.5844 of 2020 balakrishnan ... appellant in both the cmas vs. vimala ... respondent in both the cmas prayer: this civil miscellaneous appeal is filed under section 19 f the family courts act r/w section 28 of the hindu marriage act against theorder and decretal order dated 08.11.2019 passed in h.m.o.p.no.225 of2018 on the file of the family court at cuddalore. for appellant : no appearance for respondent : mr.muralidharan page 1/4common judgment(judgment of the court was delivered by j. nisha banu, j) when the matter came up for hearing on 03.12.2024, the learned counsel for the appellant was not present and the matter was directed to be listed on 04.12.2024 under the caption ''for dismissal'' by observing as follows: "on an earlier occasion, counsel for appellant sought adjournment and it was specifically stated that if the appellant does not argue the matter today(03.12.2024), orders will be passed based on the available records.2. however, today(03.12.2024) when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant.3. post on 04.12.2024 'for dismissal'.2. in order to give one more opportunity to the appellant, the matter is listed today. even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. learned counsel for the respondent ispage 2/4 present. it appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. therefore, this court has no other option except to dismiss the appeals for non-prosecution. accordingly, the civil miscellaneous appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. no costs. consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.(j.n.b, j.) (r.s.v., j.) vsi to the family court at cuddalore. page 3/4j. nisha banu, j.andr. sakthivel, j.vsi and page 4/4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.12.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL and and C.M.P.No.5844 of 2020 Balakrishnan ... Appellant in both the CMAs Vs. Vimala ... Respondent in both the CMAs Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 f the Family Courts Act r/w section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act against the

order and decretal order dated 08.11.2019 passed in H.M.O.P.No.225 of

2018 on the file of the Family Court at Cuddalore. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.Muralidharan Page 1/4

COMMON JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by J. Nisha Banu, J) When the matter came up for hearing on 03.12.2024, the learned counsel for the appellant was not present and the matter was directed to be listed on 04.12.2024 under the caption ''For dismissal'' by observing as follows: "On an earlier occasion, counsel for appellant sought adjournment and it was specifically stated that if the appellant does not argue the matter today(03.12.2024), orders will be passed based on the available records.

2. However, today(03.12.2024) when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant.

3. Post on 04.12.2024 'for dismissal'.

2. In order to give one more opportunity to the appellant, the matter is listed today. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent is

Page 2/4 present. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the appeals for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

(J.N.B, J.) (R.S.V., J.) vsi To The Family Court at Cuddalore. Page 3/4

J. NISHA BANU, J.

and

R. SAKTHIVEL, J.

vsi and Page 4/4

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial