Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

D. Francis Vs Mr. Anand,

D. Francis vs Mr. Anand,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1488083

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CONT P/4324/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

D. Francis

Respondent

Mr. Anand,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27-02-2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice n. anand venkatesh d. francis s/o. deva masilamani padayachi, madha koil street, nadu sathipattu village, panruti taluk, ..petitioner(s) vs mr. anand, the tahsildar, panruti, panruti taluk, ..contemnor(s) prayer: this contempt petition is filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act, 1971, to punish the respondent for his wilful act of disobedience of the order dated 16.03.2020 passed by this court in w.p.no. 6580 of 2020 for petitioner(s): mr. r.gururaj for contemnor(s): mr. abishekmurthy, government advocate page1 of 2n.anand venkatesh, j.asiorderwhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the proceedings of the respondent dated 09.02.2026 was placed before this court.2. recording the said proceedings, this contempt petition is closed. if thepetitioner is aggrieved, it is left open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 27-02-2026 asi to anand, tahsildar, panruti, panruti taluk, page2 of 2

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH D. Francis S/o. Deva Masilamani Padayachi, Madha Koil Street, Nadu Sathipattu Village, Panruti Taluk, ..Petitioner(s) Vs Mr. Anand, The Tahsildar, Panruti, Panruti Taluk, ..Contemnor(s) PRAYER: This Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for his wilful act of disobedience of the order dated 16.03.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 6580 of 2020 For Petitioner(s): Mr. R.Gururaj For Contemnor(s): Mr. Abishekmurthy, Government Advocate Page1 of 2

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

Asi

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the proceedings of the respondent dated 09.02.2026 was placed before this Court.

2. Recording the said proceedings, this Contempt Petition is closed. If the

petitioner is aggrieved, it is left open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 27-02-2026 Asi To Anand, Tahsildar, Panruti, Panruti Taluk, Page2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial