Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aboobacker vs Ramla

Aboobacker vs RAMLA

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Oct 27, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1487456

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RCRev./179/2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aboobacker

Respondent

RAMLA

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.b.suresh kumar & the honourable mr.justice basant balaji thursday, the 27th day of october 2022/5th karthika, 1944 rcrev. no. 179 of 2015 against the order/judgment in rca no.21 of 2012 of district court& sessions court,manjeri concurring with the common order in rcp no.17 of 2009 of munsiff court, manjeri revision petitioner/respondent/respondent: palliyalithodika aboobacker s/o. kunhali, karippur amsom and desom, kottapparambu (kondotty panchayath vii ward room no.1345) by advs. sri.v.t.raghunath smt.c.v.rajalakshmi respondents/appellants/petitioners: 1 ramla d/o.moideenkutty, 37 years, palliparamban house, 2 shabeer ali s/o.moideenkutty, 33 years, palliparamban house, 3 sarabi d/o.moideenkutty, 31 years, palliparamban house, 4 mohammad shameem s/o.moideenkutty, 29 years, palliparamban house, this rent control revision having come up for admission on 27.10.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: r.c.rev. no.179 of 2015 2 p.b.suresh kumar & basant balaji, jj. r.c.rev. no.179 of 2015 dated this the 27th day of october, 2022.orderthis is a revision petition preferred by the tenant in a proceedings for eviction instituted under the kerala buildings (lease and rent control) act challenging the order of eviction passed against him by the rent control court and the decision of the appellate authority affirming the same.2. when this matter was taken up, the learnedcounsel for the revision petitioner submitted that pending disposal of the revision petition, the tenant has surrendered vacant possession of the premises to the landlord, and in the light of the said subsequent development, the matter is not pressed. in the light of the submission made by the learned r.c.rev. no.179 of 2015 3 counsel for the revision petitioner, the revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. p.b.suresh kumar, judge. basant balaji, judge. mn

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022/5TH KARTHIKA, 1944 RCREV. NO. 179 OF 2015 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN RCA NO.21 OF 2012 OF DISTRICT COURT& SESSIONS COURT,MANJERI CONCURRING WITH THE COMMON ORDER IN RCP NO.17 OF 2009 OF MUNSIFF COURT, MANJERI REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: PALLIYALITHODIKA ABOOBACKER S/O. KUNHALI, KARIPPUR AMSOM AND DESOM, KOTTAPPARAMBU (KONDOTTY PANCHAYATH VII WARD ROOM NO.1345) BY ADVS. SRI.V.T.RAGHUNATH SMT.C.V.RAJALAKSHMI RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS: 1 RAMLA D/O.MOIDEENKUTTY, 37 YEARS, PALLIPARAMBAN HOUSE, 2 SHABEER ALI S/O.MOIDEENKUTTY, 33 YEARS, PALLIPARAMBAN HOUSE, 3 SARABI D/O.MOIDEENKUTTY, 31 YEARS, PALLIPARAMBAN HOUSE, 4 MOHAMMAD SHAMEEM S/O.MOIDEENKUTTY, 29 YEARS, PALLIPARAMBAN HOUSE, THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.C.Rev. No.179 of 2015 2 P.B.SURESH KUMAR & BASANT BALAJI, JJ. R.C.Rev. No.179 of 2015 Dated this the 27th day of October, 2022.

ORDER

This is a revision petition preferred by the tenant in a proceedings for eviction instituted under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act challenging the order of eviction passed against him by the Rent Control Court and the decision of the Appellate Authority affirming the same.

2. When this matter was taken up, the learned

counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that pending disposal of the revision petition, the tenant has surrendered vacant possession of the premises to the landlord, and in the light of the said subsequent development, the matter is not pressed. In the light of the submission made by the learned R.C.Rev. No.179 of 2015 3 counsel for the revision petitioner, the revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE. BASANT BALAJI, JUDGE. Mn

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial