Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S.L.Darani Vs R.Sanjaykumar

S.L.Darani vs R.Sanjaykumar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 09, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1485883

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
TR CMP/1086/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.L.Darani

Respondent

R.Sanjaykumar

Excerpt

.....goel), when the wife pleaded that she was unable to bear the traveling expenses and even to travel alone and stay at bombay, the supreme court ordered transfer of proceedings. ii. in 2000 (10) scc 304 (geeta heera vs. harish chander heera), the hon’ble supreme court has held that where the petitioner's wife has pleaded lack of money, the same has to be considered.iii. in lalita a. ranga vs. ajay champalal ranja reported in (2009) 9 scc 355, wherein the wife, who was having small child and she was finding it difficult to travel from jaipur to bombay, and the hon’ble apex court accepting her request ordered the transfer petition in favour of the wife transferring the transfer petition from family court at bandra in mumbai to the family court at jaipur.”7. in consideration of the above said details, the request of thepetitioner herein / wife appears to be based on justifiable cause and accordingly, this transfer civil miscellaneous petition is allowed. sequel to page3 of 5 this, h.mo.p.no.36 of 2025 pending on the file of the additional sub court, hosur, is withdrawn and transferred to the file of the family court, coimbatore. the learned judge, family court, coimbatore, on receipt of the records shall take all effective steps to try and dispose of the matter in accordance with law at the earliest. no costs. consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed. 09-04-2026 index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no mac to1. the additional sub court, hosur2. the family court, coimbatore page4 of 5r.kalaimathi, j.mac and cmp no.24454 of 2025 09-04-2026 page5 of 5

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09-04-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI and CMP No.24454 of 2025 S.L.Darani D/o. Loganathan, No.36/11D, Bhuvaneswari Nagar, Thekkupalayam Post, Periyanaikkenpalayam, Coimbatore - 641020. ..Petitioner(s) Vs. R.Sanjaykumar S/o. Rajendran, Residing at 29/65, 21 Cross, iBharathidasan Street, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. Currenlty residing at No.35, Agasthiya Avenue, Nathan Nagar Extension, Kothur Road, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, to withdraw and transfer in HMOP No.36 of 2025 which is pending on the file of the Additional Sub Court, at Hosur to be tried before the Family Court at Coimbatore District. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.M.Dinesh Sharma For Respondent(s): Mr.G.Ashok kumar Page1 of 5

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner (wife) and the learned counsel for the respondent (husband).

2. The respondent in H.M.O.P.No.36 of 2025 on the file of the Additional

Sub Court, Hosur, is the petitioner herein. The said H.M.O.P. has been filed for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

3. The petitioner would aver that she has been residing at Coimbatore

along with her parents and she finds it difficult to travel to Hosur from Coimbatore for all the Court hearings, as she has to travel a distance of approximately 305 kms one way.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would reiterate the grounds set out in the petition and seeks transfer of the aforesaid O.P. to the Family Court at Coimbatore.

5. The learned counsel for the respondent would strenuously argue that before the Sub Court, she can even represent her case through counsel and seeks dismissal of the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition. Page2 of 5

6. The principles regarding transfer petitions, more specifically in the matters of matrimonial cases are well settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the following cases:-

“i. In AIR 2000 SC 3512 (1) (Mona Aresh Goel vs. Aresh Satya Goel), when the wife pleaded that she was unable to bear the traveling expenses and even to travel alone and stay at Bombay, the Supreme Court ordered transfer of proceedings. ii. In 2000 (10) SCC 304 (Geeta Heera Vs. Harish Chander Heera), the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that where the petitioner's wife has pleaded lack of money, the same has to be considered.

Iii. In Lalita A. Ranga Vs. Ajay Champalal Ranja reported in (2009) 9 SCC 355, wherein the wife, who was having small child and she was finding it difficult to travel from Jaipur to Bombay, and the Hon’ble Apex Court accepting her request ordered the transfer petition in favour of the wife transferring the transfer petition from Family Court at Bandra in Mumbai to the Family Court at Jaipur.”

7. In consideration of the above said details, the request of the

petitioner herein / wife appears to be based on justifiable cause and accordingly, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. Sequel to Page3 of 5 this, H.MO.P.No.36 of 2025 pending on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Hosur, is withdrawn and transferred to the file of the Family Court, Coimbatore. The learned Judge, Family Court, Coimbatore, on receipt of the records shall take all effective steps to try and dispose of the matter in accordance with law at the earliest. No Costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 09-04-2026 Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No MAC To

1. The Additional Sub Court, Hosur

2. The Family Court, Coimbatore Page4 of 5

R.KALAIMATHI, J.

MAC and CMP No.24454 of 2025 09-04-2026 Page5 of 5

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial