Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

T.Shanthi vs Venkatesan

T.Shanthi vs Venkatesan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 02, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1485314

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/31381/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

T.Shanthi

Respondent

Venkatesan

Excerpt

.....of 2019, on the file of the learned judicial magistrate, sulur, thereby taken cognizance for the offence punishable under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, as against this petitioner.2. when this court was about to dismiss the quash petition,since no ground is made out to quash the entire proceeding, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the quash petition and also sought for dispense with for the appearance of the petitioner before the trial court. the learned counsel has also made an endorsement in the court bundle, today, to that effect.3. considering the above submissions and endorsement, thiscourt is permitted the petitioner to withdraw this petition. considering the facts and circumstances, the personal appearance of the petitioner is dispensed with and she shall be represented by a counsel after filing appropriate application. however, the petitioner shall be present before the court at the time of furnishing of copies, framing charges, questioning under section 313 cr.p.c., and at the time of passing judgment. the trialcourt is directed to complete the trial within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.4. accordingly, the criminal original petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. index : yes/no neutral citation : yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderrts to1. the judicial magistrate, sulur g.k.ilanthiraiyan. j, rts

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.03.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

T.Shanthi Partner Guru Ragavendra Textiles, W/o.K.V.Thangavel, 112-A, Saradhambal Nagar, 3rd Street, Karumathampatti, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District - 641 659. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Venkatesan S/o.Murugesan, No.149, Saradambal Nagar, Karumathampatti, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District - 641 659. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records of the Impugned proceedings pending in C.C.No.100 of 2019, on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Sulur and quash the same.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.W.Camyles Gandhi For Respondent(s): No appearance

ORDER

This petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.100 of 2019, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sulur, thereby taken cognizance for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, as against this petitioner.

2. When this Court was about to dismiss the quash petition,

since no ground is made out to quash the entire proceeding, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the quash petition and also sought for dispense with for the appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court. The learned counsel has also made an endorsement in the Court bundle, today, to that effect.

3. Considering the above submissions and endorsement, this

Court is permitted the petitioner to withdraw this petition. Considering the facts and circumstances, the personal appearance of the petitioner is dispensed with and she shall be represented by a counsel after filing appropriate application. However, the petitioner shall be present before the Court at the time of furnishing of copies, framing charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C., and at the time of passing judgment. The trial

Court is directed to complete the trial within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order.

4. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No

Speaking/non-speaking order

rts To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Sulur G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, rts

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial