Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Parvadham Vs The Commissioner

Parvadham vs The Commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 24, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1485151

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/6468/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Parvadham

Respondent

The Commissioner

Advocate Mr. S.Gopinathan

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 24.02.2026coramthe honourable ms. justice p.t. asha w.p.no. 6468 of 2026 parvadham ...petitioner vs. 1.the commissioner, public health, ribbon buildings chennai-3 2.the director institute of child health and hospital for children egmore chennai-8 ...respondents prayer: writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, seeking writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to correct the petitioner’s name as parvadham instead of ranjani in the petitioner’s son’s birth certificate no.2017/05/61a/010995/0, by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 06.04.2024. for petitioner : mr. a.venkatesan for respondent 1: mr. s.gopinathan standing counsel for respondent 2: mr. m.bindran additional government pleaderorderthis writ petition is filed for the following relief: “to direct the 1st respondent to correct the petitioner’s name as parvadham instead of ranjani in the petitioner’s son’s birth certificate no.2017/05/61a/010995/0, by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 06.04.2024.”2. the case of the petitioner is that her name was wrongly mentioned as “ranjani” in her son’s birth certificate. therefore, on 06.04.2024, the petitioner made a representation to the respondents to correct the same. however, there is no response to the same. therefore, the petitioner is before this court.3. considering the limited relief sought by the petitioner, this writpetition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. no costs. 24.02.2026 kan to 1.the commissioner, public health, ribbon buildings chennai-3 2.the director institute of child health and hospital for children egmore chennai-8 p.t. asha, j kan 24.02.2026

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 24.02.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No. 6468 of 2026 Parvadham ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Public Health, Ribbon Buildings Chennai-3 2.The Director Institute of Child Health and Hospital for Children Egmore Chennai-8 ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to correct the petitioner’s name as Parvadham instead of Ranjani in the petitioner’s son’s birth certificate No.2017/05/61A/010995/0, by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 06.04.2024. For Petitioner : Mr. A.Venkatesan For Respondent 1: Mr. S.Gopinathan Standing Counsel For Respondent 2: Mr. M.Bindran Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

This writ petition is filed for the following relief: “To direct the 1st respondent to correct the petitioner’s name as Parvadham instead of Ranjani in the petitioner’s son’s birth certificate No.2017/05/61A/010995/0, by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 06.04.2024.”

2. The case of the petitioner is that her name was wrongly mentioned as “Ranjani” in her son’s birth certificate. Therefore, on 06.04.2024, the petitioner made a representation to the respondents to correct the same. However, there is no response to the same. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court.

3. Considering the limited relief sought by the petitioner, this writ

petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s representation within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 24.02.2026 kan To 1.The Commissioner, Public Health, Ribbon Buildings Chennai-3 2.The Director Institute of Child Health and Hospital for Children Egmore Chennai-8 P.T. ASHA, J kan 24.02.2026

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Parvadham vs The Commissioner Same Judge Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales