Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

David vs Ani P N

DAVID vs ANI P N

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 01, 2022
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1484972

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/955/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

DAVID

Respondent

ANI P N

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sathish ninan wednesday, the 1st day of june 2022 / 11th jyaishta, 1944 against the judgment dated 25.11.2021 in wp(c) 15308/2021 of high court of kerala petitioner/ petitioner: david aged 87 years s/o. pathrose, thoppil house, kokkappilli kara, thiruvaniyoor village, ernakulam district, pin - 682308 by adv george sebastian respondent/3rd respondent: ani p n age and father's name not known to the petitioner, presently working as the revenue divisional officer, (maintenance tribunal under the maintenance and welfare of senior citizens act), the revenue divisional office, muvattupuzha, , pin - 686669 this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 01.06.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:sathish ninan, j.============================== cont.case (c).no.955 of 2022 ========================== dated this the 1st day of june, 2022judgmentlet the proceedings be disposed of in terms of the directions in the judgment in w.p(c).no.15308/2021 within a period of three months. the contempt case is closed without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner. sd/- sathish ninan, judge rsr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 11TH JYAISHTA, 1944 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.11.2021 IN WP(C) 15308/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/ PETITIONER: DAVID AGED 87 YEARS S/O. PATHROSE, THOPPIL HOUSE, KOKKAPPILLI KARA, THIRUVANIYOOR VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682308 BY ADV GEORGE SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT: ANI P N AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, (MAINTENANCE TRIBUNAL UNDER THE MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF SENIOR CITIZENS ACT), THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, MUVATTUPUZHA, , PIN - 686669 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Sathish Ninan, J.

============================== Cont.Case (C).No.955 of 2022 ========================== Dated this the 1st day of June, 2022

JUDGMENT

Let the proceedings be disposed of in terms of the directions in the judgment in W.P(C).No.15308/2021 within a period of three months. The contempt case is closed without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner. Sd/- Sathish Ninan, Judge rsr

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial