Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Babu vs Sheena Babu

BABU vs Sheena Babu

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 04, 2022
~10 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1484618

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/205/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

BABU

Respondent

Sheena Babu

Excerpt

.....a.mcjhan gd m(jstaque & tere honou rable .ns. tus tich sophy thonms monday, the 4th day 0f april 2022 / 14th chaithra, 1944 e`mt.app eai, no.2o5 of 2o2i against the order/judgient in 0p 717/2017 0f famii,y court, ue tj-gai) appeliant/petitioner:babu aged 46 years s/o. appukuttan, pranav bhavan, pirambilkonam, kulakode, now residing at tc 34/628, bose house, vettukadu, thiruvananthapuram-695 542. by advs. george mathew sri.dipu james sri . m . d . sas ikumaran smt.bhanu thilak shri.mathew k.t. shri.george k.v. shri.praveen s. respondent eta s pondent : sheena babu aged 44 years d/o. yesudas, pranav bhavan, pirambikonam, kulakode p.o. , vellanad, thiruvananthapuram-695 542.by advs. d . aji thkumar harsha s. nair this mat.appeal having been finally heard on 04.04.2022, along with rpfc.291/2018, the court on the same day delivered the following: mat.appeal no.205/21 & r.p(fc) no.291/18 2 in teie high count of keraia at ernakulm4 present the honou rabi,i mr. ]ustlce a.muhm4ei] mus taque & the honou rabi.i ms. dustlce sophy thoras monday, the 4th day 0f april 2022 / 14th chaithra, 1944 rpfc no. 291 0f 2018 against the ori)er/-ud®ent in mc 181/2ol6 of m mii.i cot]rt, reduimngnl] did . 24 . o4 . 2oi8 revision petitioner/counter petitioner :babu a.s. aged 45 years, s/o. appukuttan, cf 2150, d-coy, sai camp, peroorkada, thiruvananthapuram -695 005. by advs. sri . k . s . hariharaputhran smt.bhanu thilak sri.dipu james sri.george mathew sri . m . d . sas ikumar sri.sunil kumar a.g sri. sethuram dharmapalan respcindents/petitioners: sheena babu aged 43 years, d/o. ei.izabeth suguna bhai, vp 11/312, pranav bhavan, pirimpinkonam, kulakkodu, vellanad p.o., thiruvananthapuram -695 542. pranav 8. aged 16 years, s/o. babu (minor), vp 11/312, pranav bhavan, pirimpinkonam, kulakkodu, vellanad p.o. , thiruvananthapuram -695 542. mat.appeal no.205/21 & r.p(fc) no.291/18 3 3 prince 8. aged 12 years, s/o. babu (minor), vp 11/312, pranav bhavan, pirimpinkonam, kulakkodu,.....

Full Judgment

IN THE EIIex cou RT oF KERAILzi AT ERNAKul LAM PRESENT THE HONou RABI,E MR. rusTlcH A.MCJHAn GD M(JSTAQUE & TERE HONou RABLE .ns. Tus TICH sopHy THonms MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY 0F APRIL 2022 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1944 e`mT.App EAI, No.2o5 oF 2o2i AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGIENT IN 0P 717/2017 0F FAMII,Y COURT, ue TJ-GAI) APPELIANT/PETITIONER:

BABU AGED 46 YEARS S/O. APPUKUTTAN, PRANAV BHAVAN, PIRAMBILKONAM, KULAKODE, NOW RESIDING AT TC 34/628, BOSE HOUSE, VETTUKADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 542. BY ADVS. GEORGE MATHEW SRI.DIPU JAMES SRI . M . D . SAS IKUMARAN SMT.BHANU THILAK SHRI.MATHEW K.T. SHRI.GEORGE K.V. SHRI.PRAVEEN S. RESPONDENT Eta S PONDENT : SHEENA BABU AGED 44 YEARS D/O. YESUDAS, PRANAV BHAVAN, PIRAMBIKONAM, KULAKODE P.O. , VELLANAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 542.

BY ADVS. D . AJI THKUMAR HARSHA S. NAIR THIS MAT.APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.04.2022, ALONG WITH RPFC.291/2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mat.Appeal No.205/21 & R.P(FC) No.291/18 2 IN TEIE HIGH count OF KERAIA AT ERNAKULm4 PRESENT THE HONOu RABI,I MR. ]usTlcE A.MUHm4EI] Mus TAQUE & THE HONOu RABI.I ms. dusTlcE sOpHy THORAs MONDAy, THE 4TH DAY 0F APRIL 2022 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1944 RPFC NO. 291 0F 2018 AGAINST THE ORI)ER/-uD®ENT IN Mc 181/2ol6 oF m MII.I cot]RT, REDuimNGnl] DID . 24 . o4 . 2oi8 REVISION PETITIONER/COUNTER PETITIONER :

BABU A.S. AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. APPUKUTTAN, CF 2150, D-COY, SAI CAMP, PEROORKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 005. BY ADVS. SRI . K . S . HARIHARAPUTHRAN SMT.BHANU THILAK SRI.DIPU JAMES SRI.GEORGE MATHEW SRI . M . D . SAS IKUMAR SRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G SRI. SETHURAM DHARMAPALAN RESPCINDENTS/PETITIONERS: SHEENA BABU AGED 43 YEARS, D/O. EI.IZABETH SUGUNA BHAI, VP 11/312, PRANAV BHAVAN, PIRIMPINKONAM, KULAKKODU, VELLANAD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 542. PRANAV 8. AGED 16 YEARS, S/O. BABU (MINOR), VP 11/312, PRANAV BHAVAN, PIRIMPINKONAM, KULAKKODU, VELLANAD P.O. , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 542. Mat.Appeal No.205/21 & R.P(FC) No.291/18 3 3 PRINCE 8. AGED 12 YEARS, S/O. BABU (MINOR), VP 11/312, PRANAV BHAVAN, PIRIMPINKONAM, KULAKKODU, VELLANAD P.O. , THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 542. (RESPONDENTS 2 & 3 ARE MINORS, AND THEY ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER SHEENA BABU, AGED 43 YEARS, D/O. ELIZABETH SUGUNA BHAI - 1ST RESPONDENT) BY ADV SRI.D.AJITHKUMAR THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.04.2022, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.205/2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mat.Appeal No.205/21 & R.P(FC) No.291/18 4 A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE &

SOPHY THOMAS, JJ.

Mat,Appeal No.205 of 2021 & R.P. (FC) No.291 of 2018 Dated this the 4th day of April, 2022

JUDGMENT

A.Muhamed Mustaaue, J.

The parties were referred for mediation. In the mediation, they settled all their disputes. The memorandum of agreement entered into between the parties is on board. The memorandum of agreement is recorded. It is submitted that, in the light of the settlement, the marriage between parties has been dissolved by decree of divorce granted by the Family Court, Nedumangad. In the light of the memorandum of agreement, these matters are disposed of, The memorandum of agreement will form part of the judgment. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE Sd/- SOPHY THOMAS JUDGE Smp IVIEMORANDUM OF /`GRE:EMENl. UNDER SECTION 89 0F THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH RULES 24 & 25 0F THE MEDIATION RULES 2005 CIVIL PROCEDURE (ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION) RULES 2008

ln the courtof uov,\b|a t¥\ah C®uv+ ot T;hj-aftyifi!fa os/As/CMA/Mc;cMp/ No rv)c`+. Ap7ca\ NS . lob-\2L\ pta+attrfe/Appellan;}S{;P;t:|{:::: : Bop?:\n:v\b BS£Jauh\[h¥Q6:3 o`t T|}:"=±|:2^8/c¥\Sf-£VAiL i..`efendafi{s£Riespondents/Col;I:teT!`ctjtie"`rs sh e_ey`cT` tribu i\D iesi`cic`s rl Q`c3?crtydcin+ qryarav Bhcgivc`tvi tck\ldclu ¢iD The parties above named beg to submit a.e follows : \re_\ca,,<5

1. The aforesaid Suit/Appeal/Petition/Complaint wore reforrod to mediation for S;o!ving the dispute between the parties. In the coilrse of mediation they have resolved their iiispute and have agreed to the following tei.ms and conditlo}1s.

\i a mrv3`b €tbqs (ngtoochc"ihs"gr O`'m ¢`'a+`Th` iliD.ra9cot Gtt3\c9H6J aQ=lm on` 6Vi} GT} i -, codsi\ke A,i oiomifE2_2>de` .gblr> ®` c+\`f.1 f=\rsva® (> anca` co 1 dr` siiaj\ cngl{y`.r\stStxcoi3s{`,yl i (iii) cl. 3` cTicuf\t ®! ctry02®cutf2JiG`apJ

(iv) c3j2bate CT»9\* CL2.S`O\C2_aG3 ct)~±b c3jlc/ -

(v) ajiclt co r`¥ilt`er c|t@±t QLQ\al tn~alcyl?s al\€c=±\6T`~± e2`i7 \ \D_3 cINorfa cortyp`cl S2+\ 6`ul€ oJhoq TS (® ®ca`& CT`.xpcl6>c5r>Z* `

__ -- -E¥" TCL, n (=xp)-a±tcoledi-6|` rt criT. Lrrv7s C3>cDd i >r`' Dhi S` cco stalord cT>?ql `±cag±r24ir a)mr>\gr bc7mr3`± oir§ ay g) rhocquThor?.a3`\ Gtre nlcL tgfolapjcarv Gh lr€ cL`tlr3ly3u aj\cLJi®c`ji®cj 9Aa. fy{ rrmcD ~.1'@ ro9ic±

cJ7alDi 6|czr,add rtrfA~-lf< quJa\ TT~sis c"ic` *`` ng~>-6v`F-`r®`ztsy`q 0 . cive r5£>c* rtl7@ a:7t6>haaT2L?r Gulfers< CMs\2_Coo ror-alis cLrric\ty2jall L+icar e»ci3® 2r_ rs)|fT``6io€ Hl\\ \ , |+i\\\~\ rocfi| croral crtytb act cD~Lt6iJ3cie ci DQ)r`Tn~9

rut €j? Qcfi g2~~LIca_C). aJ S\ 3iif>Lg}) ruf@ i--±5SiS-...?1 r-te ' - 3 - 65G©qpl\ c"seeJ czryl-5\ c± c".auy> _ 62creADicu)i\ rm~ra7`to apdrrvT>oap ct@onnrve J2_ GfrocBl ulrfe an@cke G=aapj ^iril 6`1ChmiDue-ll 6`D qug€ C2brt€ alto cT)A c-tSlc*Cul@ C>apr'_ cTDeiif~qJ s\ - s` c-~L Y)'C~ al\qk EiM Qv9c^ Riv7c]\ S€tt\eLmcji\~ rl rTh 9\ Cm-art C3g\ 9?a-rto`ng)'>{`r-Trt= 9`S\Ocgiv]i ciirhen Outg\crfe G©r\ 4\ul`e+\| cnrarfo\`ho 6ia ea c-i c`6`'ar€ir czr`-c72_r} \a±cyv6 5-. a mf+fo Y).1 9i\na 6`aAfil c2) 2» r„ 3J Ln cLrtQr`+ cpc DIQ.icTub cb6ty`,al\ced c...-.` or®tilmi0u`®c+\\1\\±\faF-2+`.c2rii]*c5i l-..-:`xpfro,` 2¢.2.2_ ¢\25r'®t-.rl>` a. CTUD Q2rcoc± rL6`*\ cn„i\>citr

rvrd] r JD CThi@ rt`<2Sr£\9|fL2ELJ 2Lc>i.2_ •tcbrS|`cir67 \D~`>O cli;18Lcfro`rfe Gt+n`` er^ cmrarfelcD\ Gii3\BoS O`" f5) Clto tDo>6Ty+inds tgp, ci.i c`i o'J\rty`cylQLo .~=ic£_0 i},cT`,"9 \D-') a car)9+ t'n3\ ngvi caFTiHa\J\ (:9Lp> r;r7GD Q'J\fmcy~` ttio q„" n\ qjraici\al bd5-r* C±Fat cacdelerierlr A q6gr QLO 6inDf`t 8ic2DTytr c>`a+ €crfu\sHa5. t`j6`co Cq> cl+`;\ pr,at-r?LC2„pfT~ar- 6 . i=15ta lD Lit f.i ` 91 fL>col®de cDc31>1ab ^`d)145cde \mft}\®igr\ @2£giv= €~rndibil grLf» - 9>.s\fa7i\Th` cuii9en drLIih,con©lt^ir* dyL a 6)r'7a`C2 rrmi's ot``S atdy eihoscol c5`j ds 9j^gr CT`,_PCD Olr>t d` Ab 9.is 6iLal in `\ ro k 6yl\ apt 6"`1^~\ cOcF- cT`T2D5® S\ cvindL r>rin`®flgrp_ c`L rrtyr*£Ci»l\ rioti+" ap®m C"ia ulicn, andrlELQ7\m"_,,®m2„f`ae``\drGfro``@gr\\ •.R,.`'.:i:`:...i..:`=:.` -s= ....-ife.``, • .`:- n. cmsocis G>=\ .v]kQm`®r`aj\tr CTv. Q@c JD at\7` rac2> a,aapx, a\ tut-9L\cds o`JJJ 'aj:T`as i a.¥,\iA\ri\ il)rcht c.,37fisisQ nl2£`r®\¢ls CO `rt`t dil 9\j (?C)|f+,1 ,

3"|C=qL° S` CT)(+.tl\c¢+ or|7 C`\\©toryl rbl o±!to`Jtci;3~ t>iq!` a>o C` \ck\ r`iL tjry`| r\i a=\be c5iL2+±rtyiilhg±;LTD `` %, 3r\ cyirJct c-5\clJ or{to¢^~ 9jun r®3i c®de¢ig`„2r fii,a c>=tca,de rtryt±hc* r2Jr`\rtyco` 3`ia_2= i=` rvArTJrrfrocht r-Cl.¥? A cnri giv`o2SS att €wh c2vi5 €``vicL\ Ct"-dr Cap eN EbrrtcLDra7L rm®rh rui'ra rLli dha\6|ap c`cmici c-®JO carie' 6tyit, eE%Nal

rl        Jgivl`cD`5)± QL_ O.P' \O\\2L\ rv|r-I
          ~^iQu\6te\           ctjrurrtocchds            C>i3iiar          c`^al`
          tvT7cTri        ~ikS         €,m„c,.r\ng`rd eJrr\^r"®o
          C=Cnc\r2FTc2= norm-Ci                       C-aJ±.i C7c6)<\ ¥2^oJ

cut QQicng) m\ a 3i\c* 6lc6`j2! rE CYX?g,i + r`A`| cT`f)Dja,i . ±1 cl S\ cv-ralcr`apg)i QJ ic`3T\nguyrL afro ch?cLru\^` ZEr C7t" i `,\ 0`c„`\j (lTa c`|/\citj(t>__cT)! \r)` cvv. ;\ cD id``O` ~ict`\ap A,`L.c2, a\3\ rve?al c"c*2toho cfsD-hb Q`_@i.`alr\ c>cazj,t„. ~Lrky c3~,CUM-tJ cmJlclcv\a\a |_uslcl 6 G\ 'q\ cuofrigrtoL |'d\ml~to~\9 CPY`rJ qn\ur 2Llc® `2rtcTto . rl g\ rn~! fm2filct apact c"lr]o` c# ctjou rvtoTirJ Gr2r>`ap 6tfrLco? n± le\£ - c= r_col~irL Q cb `Qt\ fvikq\ cngy;xrbdnlcj c9Lg-CD f\1 \ E3.` r`n o`|cgiv `rz>3cvm .`..l!.\`,..+:vi- A cm @61 CT'@ crm £)cTb Gr{` orTat\ ®3b #)cn 1 6+fl tng a,

2. In view of the aforesaid agreement entered in to between parties, the parties pray that the suit/Appeal/petition/Complaint be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid agreement.

3. In view of the aforesaid agreement, plaintiff/appellant/petitioner prays for refund

of full institution fee. 4, Parties will appear on .................. „ ....... before the court for passing orders/Decree •:. `\L€....... :..9 plaintiff/Petitioner/Complainant/AppellaJlt Defendants/CP's/Respondent rl - , le . +\d`/ocatefor o ealJ2- .',+.\`.` •` . .\S.. . Advocate for Defeiidants/CP'T./Res por`dem v r

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial