Deepak T R vs Ashma

Deepak T R vs ASHMA

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 30, 2022

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1484379

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1484379
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice a.Muhamed Mustaque,Honourable Mrs. Justice Sophy Thomas
Decided On: Jun 30, 2022
Case Number: OP (FC)/304/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepak T R

Respondent

ASHMA

Excerpt

.....petitioner before the family court, attingal in o.p (g&w) no.1536 of2021. the above original petition was filed to appointhim as a guardian of the minor daughter namely, akshita deepak. the respondent is the mother. presently the minor daughter is with the respondent. the petitioner is currently employed in zambia. he approached the family court to allow him to communicate the child through whatsapp. he also filed an early hearing petition. on account of the non consideration of these applications, the petitioner approached this court.2. notice was served on the respondents.3. the respondent-mother submits that she has no objection in allowing the petitioner-father to contact the child through whatsapp. the said submission is recorded.4. in such view of the matter, we allow the..4.. petitioner-father to contact the child on every monday, wednesday, friday and sunday through whatsapp between 7 pm to 7.30 pm (indian standard time). this original petition is disposed of as above. sd/- a.muhamed mustaque judge sd/- sophy thomas judge pr ..5.. appendix of op (fc) 304/2022 petitioner exhibits exhibit p 1 a true copy of the petition filed by the 1st petitioner as op (g&w) no.1536 of 2021 before the family court, attingal exhibit p 2 a true copy of the ia no.1 of 2021 in op (g&w) no.1536 of 2021 before the family court, attingal exhibit p 3 a true copy of the ia no.01 of 2022 in op (g&w) no.1536 of 2021 before the family court, attingal exhibit p 4 a true copy of the power of attorney executed between deepak t r and rajamani

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 9TH ASHADHA, 1944 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPGW 1536/2021 OF FAMILY COURT, ATTINGAL
PETITIONERS: 1 DEEPAK T R, AGED 37 YEARS, SON OF RAJAMANI, NJARAKKATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHUTTUPADUKARA P O, EDAPPALLY NORTH VILLAGE, EDAPPALLY DESOM, ERNAKULAM-682 024. REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER RAJAMANI, AGED 68 YEARS, NJARAKKATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHUTTUPADUKARA P O, EDAPPALLY NORTH VILLAGE, EDAPPALLY DESOM, ERNAKULAM-682024., PIN - 682 024 2 AKSHITHA DEEPAK, AGED 7 YEARS REPRESENTED BY HER GUARDIAN AND FATHER DEEPAK T R, NJARAKKATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHUTTUPADUKARA P O, EDAPPALLY NORTH VILLAGE, EDAPPALLY DESOM, ERNAKULAM-682 024. BY ADVS. V.JOHN MANI JACKSON JOHNY VARGHESE SABU SETHULAKSHMI K.K. DIANA LAURANCE PAUL RESPONDENT: ASHMA, AGED 34 YEARS, ROHINI HOUSE, MAITHANAM, VARKALA P O, VARAKALA DESOM AND VILLAGE, VARKALA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 141

BY ADVS. Krishna Mani B. ..2.. SAABIR F. HAQ(K/1655/1999) N.V.SANDHYA(K/438/2002) DHANUJA M.S(K/001519/2018) THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..3..

J U D G M E N T

A. Muhamed Mustaque, J The petitioner is the father of the minor child namely, Akshita Deepak. The petitioner is the petitioner before the Family Court, Attingal in O.P (G&W) No.1536 of

2021. The above original petition was filed to appoint

him as a guardian of the minor daughter namely, Akshita Deepak. The respondent is the mother. Presently the minor daughter is with the respondent. The petitioner is currently employed in Zambia. He approached the Family Court to allow him to communicate the child through whatsApp. He also filed an early hearing petition. On account of the non consideration of these applications, the petitioner approached this Court.

2. Notice was served on the respondents.

3. The respondent-mother submits that she has no objection in allowing the petitioner-father to contact the child through whatsApp. The said submission is recorded.

4. In such view of the matter, we allow the

..4.. petitioner-father to contact the child on every Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Sunday through WhatsApp between 7 pm to 7.30 pm (Indian Standard Time). This original petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE Sd/- SOPHY THOMAS JUDGE PR ..5.. APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 304/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P 1 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER AS OP (G&W) NO.1536 OF 2021 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, ATTINGAL Exhibit P 2 A TRUE COPY OF THE IA NO.1 OF 2021 IN OP (G&W) NO.1536 OF 2021 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, ATTINGAL Exhibit P 3 A TRUE COPY OF THE IA NO.01 OF 2022 IN OP (G&W) NO.1536 OF 2021 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, ATTINGAL Exhibit P 4 A TRUE COPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY EXECUTED BETWEEN DEEPAK T R AND RAJAMANI

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2022 Same Parties Deepak T R vs ASHMA Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice a.Muhamed Mustaque,Honourable Mrs. Jus...