Ebony Woods vs Mathew Joy

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 29, 2022

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1484142

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1484142
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice N.Nagaresh
Decided On: Jun 29, 2022
Case Number: Con.Case(C)/929/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ebony Woods

Respondent

Mathew Joy

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.nagaresh wednesday, the 29th day of june 2022 / 8th ashadha, 1944 con.case(c) no. 929 of 2022 against the judgment in wp(c) 27045/2021 of high court of kerala petitioner: ebony woods opposite ioc pump, vallamkulam, thiruvalla, pathanamthitta, represented by its managing partner samuel chacko s/o. chacko, residing at kondoor house, njalikandom, kaviyoor po, pathanamthitta, pin - 689582 by advs. johnson gomez s.biju (kizhakkanela) sanjay johnson john gomez mohamed sheharan sanjith johnson sreedevi s. parshathy s.r. respondent: mathew joy branch manager national insurance company limited, chaganassery branch office, parakadavil shopping complex, opposite no.1 private bus stand, palace road, changanassery, kerala, pin 686101 (age and fathers name not known to the petitioner)., pin - 686101 this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 29.06.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 29th day of june, 2022 the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the directions of this court, the petitioner has received certain amount.2. the learned standing counsel representing therespondent submits that the judgment has been complied with. in view of the said facts, no further orders are necessary in the contempt of court case. accordingly, the contempt of court case is closed recording the above submissions. sd/- n. nagaresh judge aj appendix of con.case(c) 929/2022 petitioner annexuresannexure1 the certified copy of the judgementdated 24th january 2022 in wp(c) no. 27045 of 2021 annexure2 a true copy of the email communication dated 04.02.2022 sent by the petitioner to the contemner annexure3 a true copy of the reply mail communication dated 07.02.2022 sent by the contemner to the petitioner annexure4 memo of charges against the respondent

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 8TH ASHADHA, 1944 CON.CASE(C) NO. 929 OF 2022 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 27045/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER: EBONY WOODS OPPOSITE IOC PUMP, VALLAMKULAM, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SAMUEL CHACKO S/O. CHACKO, RESIDING AT KONDOOR HOUSE, NJALIKANDOM, KAVIYOOR PO, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689582 BY ADVS. JOHNSON GOMEZ S.BIJU (KIZHAKKANELA) SANJAY JOHNSON JOHN GOMEZ MOHAMED SHEHARAN SANJITH JOHNSON SREEDEVI S. PARSHATHY S.R. RESPONDENT: MATHEW JOY BRANCH MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHAGANASSERY BRANCH OFFICE, PARAKADAVIL SHOPPING COMPLEX, OPPOSITE NO.1 PRIVATE BUS STAND, PALACE ROAD, CHANGANASSERY, KERALA, PIN 686101 (AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER)., PIN - 686101 THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 29th day of June, 2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the directions of this Court, the petitioner has received certain amount.

2. The learned Standing Counsel representing the

respondent submits that the judgment has been complied with. In view of the said facts, no further orders are necessary in the contempt of court case. Accordingly, the contempt of court case is closed recording the above submissions. Sd/- N. NAGARESH JUDGE AJ APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 929/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT

DATED 24TH JANUARY 2022 IN WP(C) NO. 27045 OF 2021 Annexure2 A TRUE COPY OF THE EMAIL COMMUNICATION DATED 04.02.2022 SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE CONTEMNER Annexure3 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY MAIL COMMUNICATION DATED 07.02.2022 SENT BY THE CONTEMNER TO THE PETITIONER Annexure4 MEMO OF CHARGES AGAINST THE RESPONDENT

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2022 Same Parties Ebony Woods vs Mathew Joy Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice N.Nagaresh