Sivaraj vs Thevasigamani

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1483803

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1483803
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.Thamilselvi
Decided On: Jan 27, 2026
Case Number: CMP/23982/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sivaraj

Respondent

Thevasigamani

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27-01-2026coramthe honourable mrs.justice t.v.thamilselvi1. sivaraj s/o veerappagounder, kollapatti, manakadavu village, dharapuram taluk, tiruppur district appellant(s) vs1. thevasigamani and 12 others.respondent(s) for appellant(s): mr.aravind subramanian sr counsel for mr. manoj for respondent(s): m/s.e.shobana for rr8 to 12 m/s.s. vasavi sridevi for r6 m/s.w.camyles gandhi for r4orderthis petition is filed praying to condone the delay of 970 days in preferring the above second appeal.2. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to appellant’s illness, he could not approach the counsel within the time limit and the delay is neither wilful nor wanton.3. learned counsel appearing for respondents 8 to 12 raised objections stating that final decree application has already been filed and therefore, delay on the part of the appellants would cause hardship.4. learned counsel appearing for respondents 4 and 6 although submitted that they have no objections for allowing the present petition, submitted that the delay of 970 days is huge.5. since counsel for respondents 4 and 6 have no objections and thecounsel for respondents 8 to 12 raised objections and that the suit is for partition, to avoid further litigations and to settle the issue between the parties, this court is inclined to condone the delay with a condition that counsel for appellant/petitioner shall pay rs.2000/- to counsel for r4, rs.2000/- to counsel for r6 and rs.2000/- to counsel for r8 to r12 within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.6. the second appeal sr is to be numbered, if the same is otherwise inorder subject to compliance of above condition.7. post the matter on 13.02.2026 for reporting compliance. t.v.thamilselvi j.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-01-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

1. Sivaraj S/o Veerappagounder, Kollapatti, Manakadavu Village, Dharapuram Taluk, Tiruppur District Appellant(s) Vs

1. Thevasigamani and 12 others.

Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.Aravind Subramanian Sr Counsel for Mr. MANOJ For Respondent(s): M/s.E.Shobana For Rr8 To 12 M/s.S. Vasavi Sridevi For R6 M/s.W.Camyles Gandhi For R4

ORDER

This petition is filed praying to condone the delay of 970 days in preferring the above Second Appeal.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to appellant’s illness, he could not approach the counsel within the time limit and the delay is neither wilful nor wanton.

3. Learned counsel appearing for Respondents 8 to 12 raised objections stating that final decree application has already been filed and therefore, delay on the part of the appellants would cause hardship.

4. Learned counsel appearing for Respondents 4 and 6 although submitted that they have no objections for allowing the present petition, submitted that the delay of 970 days is huge.

5. Since counsel for respondents 4 and 6 have no objections and the

counsel for respondents 8 to 12 raised objections and that the suit is for partition, to avoid further litigations and to settle the issue between the parties, this court is inclined to condone the delay with a condition that counsel for appellant/petitioner shall pay Rs.2000/- to counsel for R4, Rs.2000/- to counsel for R6 and Rs.2000/- to counsel for R8 to R12 within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. The Second Appeal SR is to be numbered, if the same is otherwise in

order subject to compliance of above condition.

7. Post the matter on 13.02.2026 for reporting compliance. T.V.THAMILSELVI J.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Sivaraj vs Thevasigamani Same Judge Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.Thamilselvi