Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Management Vs Kalaiselvi

The Management vs Kalaiselvi

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1483336

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/19469/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Management

Respondent

Kalaiselvi

Excerpt

c.m.p.no.19469 of 2025 in c.m.a.sr.no.61835 of 2022k.govindarajan thilakavadi, j.this civil miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to condone the delay of 436 days in representing the papers in c.m.a.sr.no.61835 of 2022.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. despite the service of notice, none appeared on behalf of the respondent.4. having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, delay is condoned and this civil miscellaneous petition is allowed. 27.02.2026 mrr note: registry is directed to number c.m.a.sr.no.61835 of 2022, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

C.M.P.No.19469 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.61835 of 2022

K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to condone the delay of 436 days in representing the papers in C.M.A.SR.No.61835 of 2022.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Despite the service of notice, none appeared on behalf of the respondent.

4. Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. 27.02.2026 mrr Note: Registry is directed to number C.M.A.SR.No.61835 of 2022, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial