Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

D.Ramachandran vs State of Tamilnadu

D.Ramachandran vs State of Tamilnadu

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 02, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1483063

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/32262/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

D.Ramachandran

Respondent

State of Tamilnadu

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 02.03.2026coramthe honourable mr.justice m.dhandapani and w.m.p.nos.36172, 36176, 36177, 37109, 37111, 37110 and 37100 of 2025 1.d.ramachandran 2.r.suganthamani ... petitioners vs. coimbatore. ....respondentsprayer : writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the tender notification for online tender published on 11.06.2025, bearing tender reference no.11bcmcbe03062025, tender id.2025_pwd_566542_1 issued on behalf of the third respondent, quash the same and direct the respondent nos.2 and 3 not to alter the physical nature of the land admeasuring 1.84 acres of land in s.f.no.399 situated at villankurichi village, 0.63 acres of land in s.f.no.364/2c, 2.61 acres of land in s.f.no.365/1 and 2.21 acres of land in s.f.no.365/2 of kalapatty village, coimbatore north taluk pending disposal of o.s.no.1728 of 2017 pending on the file of the iii additional district munsif court, coimbatore.for petitioner : mr.p.rubin for respondents : mr.m.rajendiran additional government pleaderorderthe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearingfor the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. there shall be no order as to costs. connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. ncc: yes / no index : yes / no speaking order : yes / no ssb to coimbatore.m.dhandapani, j.ssb

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.03.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.36172, 36176, 36177, 37109, 37111, 37110 and 37100 of 2025 1.D.Ramachandran 2.R.Suganthamani ... Petitioners Vs. Coimbatore. ....Respondents

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the Tender Notification for online tender published on 11.06.2025, bearing Tender Reference No.11BCMCBE03062025, Tender ID.2025_PWD_566542_1 issued on behalf of the third respondent, quash the same and direct the respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to alter the physical nature of the land admeasuring 1.84 acres of land in S.F.No.399 situated at Villankurichi Village, 0.63 acres of land in S.F.No.364/2C, 2.61 acres of land in S.F.No.365/1 and 2.21 acres of land in S.F.No.365/2 of Kalapatty Village, Coimbatore North Taluk pending disposal of O.S.No.1728 of 2017 pending on the file of the III Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rubin For Respondents : Mr.M.Rajendiran Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing

for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. NCC: Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No ssb To Coimbatore.

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

ssb

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial