Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kamalam T vs Viswanathan T

Kamalam T vs Viswanathan T

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 30, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1482972

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/386/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kamalam T

Respondent

Viswanathan T

Excerpt

.....tirur taluk,malappuram district, pin-676102. *2 krishnan nair, (died) (lrs impleaded) aged 69 years s/o.malayath govindan nair,thiyyayyadath house,padinhattumuri amsom desom, post koottilangadi,pin-676506. 3 parameswaran.t, aged 66 years po.no.2213,dubai,uae,presently residing at desom,vengalur.p.o, tirur taluk, ..2.. ,pin 676102. 4 santha, aged 58 years w/o.balakrishnan.p,kunulitharayil house, kaladi amsom desom,ponnani taluk, pin-679582. 5 rejendran.t, aged 48 years desom,vengalur.p.o, tirur taluk,pin-676102. *addl r6 addl.valsala m., w/o.the late krishnan nair, aged 52 years,thiyyadath ouse, kozhithadam,padinhattumuri p.o., malappuram,pin-676 506. *addl r7 addl.manoj t., s/o.the late krishnan nair, aged 31 *addl r8 addl.mahesh t., s/o.the late krishnan nair, aged (the legal heirs of deceased second respondent are impleaded as addl.respondents 6 to 8 as perorder dated 06.09.2021 in ia.3/2020.)by advs. r5 by sri.k.mohanakannan smt.m.a.zohra this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 30.03.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..3.. ,judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellant shri. devesh m. submitted that the appellant is not intending to prosecute the matter. the submission is recorded. the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand closed. sd/- k. babu, judge kkj

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 9TH CHAITHRA, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS 82/2014 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, TIRUR ARISING FROM THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 281/2012 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, TIRUR APPELLANT/APPELLANT/3RD DEFENDANT: KAMALAM T AGED 57 YEARS W/O BALAN,D/O.MALAYATH GOVIDAN NAIR, MALAYATH KIZHAKKE VEETTIL HOUSE,THEKKAN KUTTUR AMSOM DESOM,THEKKAN KUTTUR(PO),TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,PIN-676102. BY ADV M.DEVESH RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS 1,2,4 AND 5: 1 VISWANATHAN T, 51 YEARS, S/O MALAYATH GOVINDAN NAIR, THEKKAN KUTTUR AMSOM DESOM, TIRUR TALUK,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676102. *2 KRISHNAN NAIR, (DIED) (LRS IMPLEADED) AGED 69 YEARS S/O.MALAYATH GOVINDAN NAIR,THIYYAYYADATH HOUSE,PADINHATTUMURI AMSOM DESOM, POST KOOTTILANGADI,PIN-676506. 3 PARAMESWARAN.T, AGED 66 YEARS PO.NO.2213,DUBAI,UAE,PRESENTLY RESIDING AT DESOM,VENGALUR.P.O, TIRUR TALUK, ..2.. ,

PIN 676102. 4 SANTHA, AGED 58 YEARS W/O.BALAKRISHNAN.P,KUNULITHARAYIL HOUSE, KALADI AMSOM DESOM,PONNANI TALUK, PIN-679582. 5 REJENDRAN.T, AGED 48 YEARS DESOM,VENGALUR.P.O, TIRUR TALUK,PIN-676102. *ADDL R6 ADDL.VALSALA M., W/O.THE LATE KRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 52 YEARS,THIYYADATH OUSE, KOZHITHADAM,PADINHATTUMURI P.O., MALAPPURAM,PIN-676 506. *ADDL R7 ADDL.MANOJ T., S/O.THE LATE KRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 31 *ADDL R8 ADDL.MAHESH T., S/O.THE LATE KRISHNAN NAIR, AGED (THE LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED SECOND RESPONDENT ARE IMPLEADED AS ADDL.RESPONDENTS 6 TO 8 AS PER

ORDER DATED 06.09.2021 IN IA.3/2020.)

BY ADVS. R5 BY SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN SMT.M.A.ZOHRA THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..3.. ,

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant Shri. Devesh M. submitted that the appellant is not intending to prosecute the matter. The submission is recorded. The appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand closed. Sd/- K. BABU, JUDGE kkj

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial