Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smitha vs Siva Raman

Smitha vs Siva Raman

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 25, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1482970

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/1375/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smitha

Respondent

Siva Raman

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias monday, the 25th day of july 2022 / 3rd sravana, 1944 op(c) no. 1375 of 2017 against the order/judgment in ia 3871/2016 in os 1730/2010 of ii additional sub court,thrissur petitioner/s: smitha aged 54 years w/o. jayarajan, pottekkatt house, chiyyaram village, thrissur district. by adv sri.m.k.dileep kumar respondent/s:1 siva raman aged 53 years aged 53, s/o. jagadeesan, thattuparambil house,ayyanthole 2 jaya raman aged 51 years aged 51, s/o.jagadeesan, thattuparambil house,ayyanthole 3 anantha raman aged 18, s/o. sivaraman, thattuparambil house,ayyanthole 4 lakshmi aged 19 years aged 19, d/o. sivaraman,thattuparambil house,ayyanthole 5 swarabji aged 46 years aged 46, s/o. bhaskara pillai, parliament quarters no. 614,r.k. puram, new delhi - 22. 6 gayathri aged 18, d/o. swarabji,parliament quarters no. 614,r.k. puram, new delhi - 22.this op (civil) having come up for admission on 25.07.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:c.s dias,j.--------------------------- ----------------------------- dated this the 25th day of july, 2022.judgmentthe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the original petition may be dismissed as withdrawn in view of the fact that os no.1730/2010 has been disposed of three years back. the said submission is recorded. the original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- sks/25.07.2022 c.s.dias, judge appendix of op(c) 1375/2017 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of i.a no.3338/2016 filed by the petitioner seeking adjournment of the trial of the suit. exhibit p2 true copy of i.a no.3871/2016 filed by the petitioner seeking restoration of the suit. exhibit p3 true copy of the counter filed by the 1st, 3rd and 4th respondents against the ext.p2. exhibit p4 certified copy of the order in i.a no.3871/2016 in o.s no.1730/2010 dt. 07- 03-2017 of the second additional sub court, thrissur.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 3RD SRAVANA, 1944 OP(C) NO. 1375 OF 2017 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT in IA 3871/2016 IN OS 1730/2010 OF II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,THRISSUR PETITIONER/S: SMITHA AGED 54 YEARS W/O. JAYARAJAN, POTTEKKATT HOUSE, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV SRI.M.K.DILEEP KUMAR RESPONDENT/S:

1 SIVA RAMAN AGED 53 YEARS AGED 53, S/O. JAGADEESAN, THATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE,AYYANTHOLE 2 JAYA RAMAN AGED 51 YEARS AGED 51, S/O.JAGADEESAN, THATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE,AYYANTHOLE 3 ANANTHA RAMAN AGED 18, S/O. SIVARAMAN, THATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE,AYYANTHOLE 4 LAKSHMI AGED 19 YEARS AGED 19, D/O. SIVARAMAN,THATTUPARAMBIL HOUSE,AYYANTHOLE 5 SWARABJI AGED 46 YEARS AGED 46, S/O. BHASKARA PILLAI, PARLIAMENT QUARTERS NO. 614,R.K. PURAM, NEW DELHI - 22. 6 GAYATHRI AGED 18, D/O. SWARABJI,PARLIAMENT QUARTERS NO. 614,R.K. PURAM, NEW DELHI - 22.

THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.07.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

C.S DIAS,J.

--------------------------- ----------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of July, 2022.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the original petition may be dismissed as withdrawn in view of the fact that OS No.1730/2010 has been disposed of three years back. The said submission is recorded. The original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- sks/25.07.2022 C.S.DIAS, JUDGE APPENDIX OF OP(C) 1375/2017 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF I.A NO.3338/2016 FILED BY THE PETITIONER SEEKING ADJOURNMENT OF THE TRIAL OF THE SUIT. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF I.A NO.3871/2016 FILED BY THE PETITIONER SEEKING RESTORATION OF THE SUIT. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER FILED BY THE 1ST, 3RD AND 4TH RESPONDENTS AGAINST THE EXT.P2. EXHIBIT P4 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A NO.3871/2016 IN O.S NO.1730/2010 DT. 07- 03-2017 OF THE SECOND ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THRISSUR.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial