Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anil Thomas vs State of Kerala

Anil Thomas vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 04, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1482879

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/12674/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anil Thomas

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

wp(c) no. 12760 of 2021 s/o. thomas c., nariyadukkam kadavu, munnad, kasargod, kerala - 671541. by advs.v.john mani respondent/s: general education, secretariat, thiruvananthapuram - 695001. 2 the director of general education jagathi, thiruvananthapuram - 695014. 3 the commissioner thiruvananthapuram, kerala - 695012. by smt.deepa narayanan, sr.govt. pleader this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 04.04.2022, along with wp(c).12674/2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c) no. 12674 of 2021 son of thomas c, nariyadukkam kadavu, munnad, kasargod, kerala-671 541 by advs. v.john mani respondents: general education 2, secretariat, thiruvananthapuram-695 001 2 the director of general education, jagathi, thiruvananthapuram-695 014 3 the commissioner, thiruvananthapuram, kerala-695 012 this writ petition (civil) having come up foradmission on 04.04.2022, along with wp(c).12760/2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:p.v.kunhikrishnan, j.-------------------------------- w.p.(c).nos.12760 & 12674 of 2021 ---------------------------------------------- dated this the 04th day of april, 2022judgmentwhen this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he want to file a fresh writ petition challenging the fresh notification issued by the authorities. therefore these writ petitions can be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the contentions raised in these writ petitions in the new writ petition to be filed. these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. all the contentions raised in these writ petitions are left open. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan jv judge

Full Judgment

WP(C) NO. 12760 OF 2021 S/O. THOMAS C., NARIYADUKKAM KADAVU, MUNNAD, KASARGOD, KERALA - 671541. BY ADVS.V.JOHN MANI RESPONDENT/S: GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001. 2 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION JAGATHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695014. 3 THE COMMISSIONER THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA - 695012. BY SMT.DEEPA NARAYANAN, SR.GOVT. PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.04.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).12674/2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 12674 OF 2021 SON OF THOMAS C, NARIYADUKKAM KADAVU, MUNNAD, KASARGOD, KERALA-671 541 BY ADVS. V.JOHN MANI RESPONDENTS: GENERAL EDUCATION 2, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001 2 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014 3 THE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA-695 012 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR

ADMISSION ON 04.04.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).12760/2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

-------------------------------- W.P.(C).Nos.12760 & 12674 of 2021 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 04th day of April, 2022

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he want to file a fresh writ petition challenging the fresh notification issued by the authorities. Therefore these writ petitions can be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the contentions raised in these writ petitions in the new writ petition to be filed. These writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. All the contentions raised in these writ petitions are left open. sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JV JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial