Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abdul Khader T. E. vs Jayakumar.K.B

Abdul Khader T. E. vs Jayakumar.K.B

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 24, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1482874

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/915/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abdul Khader T. E.

Respondent

Jayakumar.K.B

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice v.g.arun friday, the 24th day of june 2022 / 3rd ashadha, 1944 against the order/judgment in wp(c) 16936/2020 of high court of kerala petitioner/s/petitioner: abdul khader t. e. aged 49 years s/o. beeran haji, pwd contractor, m/s s.k.s. marketing, vavad post - 673572, koduvally, kozhikode district. by advs. p.k.vijayamohanan aiswarya v.s. respondent/s: jayakumar.k.b (age, name of father and residential address not known to the petitioner), managing director, the kerala small industries, development corporation (sidco), santhi nagar, thiruvananthapuram - 695 001. by adv biju g., sc, sidco this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 24.06.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 24th day of june, 2022 it is reported that the entire amount due to the petitioner has been paid. this is recorded and the contempt case is closed. sd/- v.g.arun judge rk appendix of con.case(c) 915/2021 petitioner annexures annexure i certified copy of the judgment dated 19.11.2020 in w.p.(c) no.16936/2020. annexure ii true copy of the acknowledgement dated 01.12.2020 of annexure i judgment. annexure iii true copy of the lawyer notice no.sks/sd & retention/2014-2020 dated 07.04.2021 to the respondent.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 3RD ASHADHA, 1944 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 16936/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S/PETITIONER: ABDUL KHADER T. E. AGED 49 YEARS S/O. BEERAN HAJI, PWD CONTRACTOR, M/S S.K.S. MARKETING, VAVAD POST - 673572, KODUVALLY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADVS. P.K.VIJAYAMOHANAN AISWARYA V.S. RESPONDENT/S: JAYAKUMAR.K.B (AGE, NAME OF FATHER AND RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE KERALA SMALL INDUSTRIES, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (SIDCO), SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. BY ADV BIJU G., SC, SIDCO THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 24th day of June, 2022 It is reported that the entire amount due to the petitioner has been paid. This is recorded and the Contempt Case is closed. Sd/- V.G.ARUN JUDGE RK APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 915/2021 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure I CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.11.2020 IN W.P.(C) NO.16936/2020. Annexure II TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DATED 01.12.2020 OF ANNEXURE I JUDGMENT. Annexure III TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE NO.SKS/SD & RETENTION/2014-2020 DATED 07.04.2021 TO THE RESPONDENT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial