Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Parameswaran vs State of Kerala

Parameswaran vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 03, 2022
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1482412

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./4013/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Parameswaran

Advocate Sri. Nireesh Mathew

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....available, the excise officials did not arrest him. the learned public prosecutor submitted that investigation is over, and final report has been submitted. if so, the arrest and detention of the petitioner is not necessary for the purpose of investigation. the mahazar also shows the presence of the petitioner at the scene, but the excise officials did not arrest him obviously, due to covid reasons. since the investigation is over and final report has been filed, the petitioner need not be arrested or detained and hence this application can be allowed.(i) the petitioner shall surrender before the jurisdictional magistrate within 2 seeks to seek regular bail.(ii) meanwhile in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall bereleased on bail on executing bond for rs.50,000/-(rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting officer.(iii) he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement,threat or promise to any person acquainted with the factsof the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing suchfacts to the court or to any police officer.(iv) he shall not tamper with the evidence.(v)he shall not commit any offence while on bail. in case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail, in accordance with law. sd/- sophy thomas judge al/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 13TH JYAISHTA, BAIL APPL. NO. 4013 OF 2022 CRIME NO.48/2021 OF CHERPLUSSERY EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, Palakkad PETITIONER/ACCUSED: PARAMESWARAN AGED 48 YEARS S/O.KUNJAN, THEVERUPARAMBIL HOUSE, THRIKKADEERI P.O, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT., PIN - 679502 BY ADV NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.P.P.SEENA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 3rd day of June, 2022. This is an application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. The petitioner is the sole accused in O.R. No.48 of 2021 of Excise Circle Office, Ottappalam registered under Section 8 (1) and 8(2) of Kerala Abkari Act 1 of 1077.

3. The allegation is that on 21.05.2021 at about 5 P.M., the petitioner was found in possession of 2 liters of arrack near an electric post at Puthenthodu.

4. The learned counsel Sri. Nireesh Mathew appearing for the

petitioner submitted that though the petitioner was very much available, the Excise Officials did not arrest him. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted that investigation is over, and final report has been submitted. If so, the arrest and detention of the petitioner is not necessary for the purpose of investigation. The mahazar also shows the presence of the petitioner at the scene, but the Excise Officials did not arrest him obviously, due to Covid reasons. Since the investigation is over and final report has been filed, the petitioner need not be arrested or detained and hence this application can be allowed.

(i) The petitioner shall surrender before the jurisdictional magistrate within 2 seeks to seek regular bail.

(ii) Meanwhile in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be

released on bail on executing bond for Rs.50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting officer.

(iii) He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement,

threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts

of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such

facts to the court or to any police officer.

(iv) He shall not tamper with the evidence.

(v)He shall not commit any offence while on bail. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the Jurisdictional Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail, in accordance with law. Sd/- SOPHY THOMAS JUDGE al/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial