Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mathew Thomas vs K Vinod

Mathew Thomas vs K Vinod

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Aug 31, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1479492

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/831/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mathew Thomas

Respondent

K Vinod

Excerpt

.....the contempt application is that an interimorder issued in wpc no.8997/2022 is not complied with. this courthad directed the respondents 1 to 4 to ensure that the crusher unit of the 6th respondent in the writ petition is functioning with all necessary licenses and permissions. subsequently, orders have been issued by the secretary of the panchayat, which is the subject matter of challenge in wpc no.16816/2022. in such circumstances, there is no necessity to continue with the contempt application. contempt of court case is hence closed without prejudice to the rights of either parties in the pending writ petitions. sd/- t.r. ravi judge pn appendix of con.case(c) 831/2022 petitioners' annexures annexure1 certified copy of the order in wpc no. annexure2 true copy of the covering letter dated 16.04.2022annexure3 true copy of the ext p8 application in annexure4 true copy of the ext p9 information in annexure5 true copy of the information dated28.04.2022 under rti act annexure6 true copy of the consent to establishing primary crusher units dated 02.03.2006 obtained from pollution control board annexure7 true copy of the notice dated 16.06.2014 obtained under the right to information act

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 9TH BHADRA, 1944 PETITIONERS/WRIT PETITIONERS: 1 MATHEW THOMAS ONAMTHURUTHIYIL, KEZHUVAMKULAM P.O, 2 MANOJ ABRAHAM MANAYKKALYYAT HOUSE, KEZHUVAMKULAM P.O, BY ADV SRI.GEORGEKUTTY MATHEW RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION: K VINOD AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETTIIONER WORKING AS THE SECRETARY OF KOZHUVANAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KOZHUVANAL P.O, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686574 BY ADV SRI.SUNIL CYRIAC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

T.R. RAVI, J.

Contempt Case (C). No.831 of 2022 Dated this the 31st day of August, 2022

JUDGMENT

The allegation in the contempt application is that an interim

order issued in WPC No.8997/2022 is not complied with. This Court

had directed the respondents 1 to 4 to ensure that the crusher unit of the 6th respondent in the writ petition is functioning with all necessary licenses and permissions. Subsequently, orders have been issued by the Secretary of the Panchayat, which is the subject matter of challenge in WPC No.16816/2022. In such circumstances, there is no necessity to continue with the contempt application. Contempt of Court Case is hence closed without prejudice to the rights of either parties in the pending writ petitions. Sd/- T.R. RAVI JUDGE Pn APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 831/2022 PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES Annexure1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER IN WPC NO. Annexure2 TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 16.04.2022

Annexure3           TRUE COPY OF THE EXT P8 APPLICATION IN
Annexure4           TRUE COPY OF THE EXT P9 INFORMATION IN
Annexure5           TRUE COPY OF THE INFORMATION DATED

28.04.2022 UNDER RTI ACT Annexure6 TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT TO ESTABLISHING PRIMARY CRUSHER UNITS DATED 02.03.2006 OBTAINED FROM POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD Annexure7 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 16.06.2014 OBTAINED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial