Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

R.Banu vs the Tahsildar

R.BANU vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 27, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1478864

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/27104/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

R.BANU

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27-03-2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice krishnan ramasamy1. r.banu2. m.mani3. e.gowri ..petitioner(s) vs2. tamil nadu housing board, rep by its managing director, 493 anna salai, nandanam, chennai- 035. ..respondent(s)prayer: this writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to process the petitioners applications for patta dated 31.05.2023 and grant patta for the petitioner’s plots situated in the layout called ‘vinayagapuram’, nerkundram, chennai- 107, comprised in plot no.4, plot no.5, and plot no.24a, survey no.284/1a, of nerkundram village, maduravoyal taluk, chennai district, without insisting no- objection from the 2nd respondent.for petitioner(s) : no appearance for respondent(s) : mr.t.k.saravanan, agp for r1 mr.a.m.ravindranath jayapal, sc for r2 page1 of 3orderwhen the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioners. however, learned additional government pleader appearing for the first respondent would submit that the petitioners have filed this writ petition for issuance of patta and the same has been issued to them on 30.12.2023 vide patta no.15863 and that may be a reason for petitioners non-appearance before this court.2. recording the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. no costs. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no vm to:2. the managing director, tamil nadu housing board, 493 anna salai, nandanam, chennai- 035. page2 of 3krishnan ramasamy, j.vm page3 of 3

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

1. R.Banu

2. M.Mani

3. E.Gowri ..Petitioner(s) Vs

2. Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Rep By Its Managing Director, 493 Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai- 035. ..Respondent(s)

Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent to process the Petitioners applications for Patta dated 31.05.2023 and grant patta for the Petitioner’s plots situated in the layout called ‘Vinayagapuram’, Nerkundram, Chennai- 107, comprised in Plot No.4, Plot No.5, and Plot No.24A, Survey No.284/1A, of Nerkundram Village, Maduravoyal Taluk, Chennai District, without insisting no- objection from the 2nd Respondent.

For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP for R1 Mr.A.M.Ravindranath Jayapal, SC for R2 Page1 of 3

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioners. However, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent would submit that the petitioners have filed this writ petition for issuance of patta and the same has been issued to them on 30.12.2023 vide patta No.15863 and that may be a reason for petitioners non-appearance before this Court.

2. Recording the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To:

2. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, 493 Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai- 035. Page2 of 3

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

VM Page3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial