Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Johnson vs T.M.Rajesh

Johnson vs T.M.Rajesh

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 24, 2022
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1478476

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MACA/878/2008

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Johnson

Respondent

T.M.Rajesh

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias monday, the 24th day of january 2022 / 4th magha, 1943 maca no. 878 of 2008 against the order/judgment in op(mv) 1283/1998 of additional motor accident claims tribunal ,ernakulam appellant/petitiner: johnson, aged 36 years, son of a.p.varkey, anamthuruthil house, oopputtil parambil, udayamperoor, nadakavu p.o.by advs. sri.anil s.raj smt.anila peter smt.k.n.rajani respondents/respondents: 1 t.m.rajesh s/o.mohanan, thoppil house, north of karthiayani temple, aroor desom, aroor village. 2 the oriental insurance company limited m.g.road, cochin 682 011 by adv sri.n.s.najeeb this motor accident claims appeal having come up for admission on 24.01.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdespite the order dated 2.12.2021, the appellant has not taken steps to effect substituted service of notice on the 1st respondent. the appeal is of the year 2008. it is assumed that the appellant is no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. sd/- c.s.dias ma/24.01.2022 judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 4TH MAGHA, 1943 MACA NO. 878 OF 2008 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP(MV) 1283/1998 OF ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/PETITINER: JOHNSON, AGED 36 YEARS, SON OF A.P.VARKEY, ANAMTHURUTHIL HOUSE, OOPPUTTIL PARAMBIL, UDAYAMPEROOR, NADAKAVU P.O.

BY ADVS. SRI.ANIL S.RAJ SMT.ANILA PETER SMT.K.N.RAJANI RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 T.M.RAJESH S/O.MOHANAN, THOPPIL HOUSE, NORTH OF KARTHIAYANI TEMPLE, AROOR DESOM, AROOR VILLAGE. 2 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED M.G.ROAD, COCHIN 682 011 BY ADV SRI.N.S.NAJEEB THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Despite the order dated 2.12.2021, the appellant has not taken steps to effect substituted service of notice on the 1st respondent. The appeal is of the year 2008. It is assumed that the appellant is no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. Sd/- C.S.DIAS ma/24.01.2022 JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial