Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sasi vs the Branch Manager

SASI vs The Branch Manager

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 26, 2022
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1477465

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MACA/3063/2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

SASI

Respondent

The Branch Manager

Excerpt

.....ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice k.vinod chandran saturday, the 26th day of february 2022 / 7th phalguna, 1943 maca no. 3063 of 2015 against the judgment in opmv 1249/2010 of additional district court & sessions court - iv & addl mact, pathanamthitta appellant: sasi aged 46 years s/o. podiyan, thekkecharuvil house, girivarga colony, uthimoodumuri & post, ranni villege & taluk, pathanamthitta sri.t.k.biju (manjinikara) smt.annie m.abraham respondent: the branch manager sreeram general insurance company ltd, anand towers, vrm road, ravipuram, ernakulam ,kochi 682 016sri.p.jacob mathew sri.mathews jacob sr. smt.preethy r. nair this motor accident claims appeal having come up for admission on 26.02.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: maca no.3063/2015 2 k.vinod chandran, j ---------------------------------------------------- m.a.c.a no.3063 of 2015 ----------------------------------------------------- dated this the 26th february, 2022judgmenta 42 year old, suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident in the year, 2010, which left him with 15% disability. the tribunal adopted notional income of rs.5,000/-. the only claim that can be made in the appeal is with respect to notional income. in ramachandrappa v. manager, royal sundaram alliance insurance company limited [(2011) 13 scc 236, the honourable supreme court adopted notional income @ rs.7500/-, for a coolie in the year 2010. hence the same can be taken for the appellant in this case. the enhancement will be as follows:- sl. head of claim amount total amount no. awarded by afterthe tribunal enhancement in appeal ` ` 1 loss of earnings 20000 30000(7500 x 4) 2 pain and sufferings 20000 20000 3 loss of amenities 20000 20000 4 transport to hospital 1000 1000 maca no.3063/2015 3 5 extra nourishment 1000 1000 6 loss of earning 163800 189000 (7500 x capacity .....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN SATURDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1943 MACA NO. 3063 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OPMV 1249/2010 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT - IV & ADDL MACT, PATHANAMTHITTA APPELLANT: SASI AGED 46 YEARS S/O. PODIYAN, THEKKECHARUVIL HOUSE, GIRIVARGA COLONY, UTHIMOODUMURI & POST, RANNI VILLEGE & TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA SRI.T.K.BIJU (MANJINIKARA) SMT.ANNIE M.ABRAHAM RESPONDENT: THE BRANCH MANAGER SREERAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, ANAND TOWERS, VRM ROAD, RAVIPURAM, ERNAKULAM ,KOCHI 682 016

SRI.P.JACOB MATHEW SRI.MATHEWS JACOB SR. SMT.PREETHY R. NAIR THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MACA No.3063/2015 2 K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J ---------------------------------------------------- M.A.C.A No.3063 of 2015 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th February, 2022

JUDGMENT

A 42 year old, suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident in the year, 2010, which left him with 15% disability. The Tribunal adopted notional income of Rs.5,000/-. The only claim that can be made in the appeal is with respect to notional income. In Ramachandrappa v. Manager, Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited [(2011) 13 SCC 236, the Honourable Supreme Court adopted notional income @ Rs.7500/-, for a coolie in the year 2010. Hence the same can be taken for the appellant in this case. The enhancement will be as follows:- Sl. Head of Claim Amount Total amount No. awarded by after

the Tribunal enhancement in appeal ` ` 1 Loss of earnings 20000 30000(7500 x 4) 2 Pain and sufferings 20000 20000 3 Loss of amenities 20000 20000 4 Transport to Hospital 1000 1000 MACA No.3063/2015 3

  5      Extra nourishment                       1000              1000
  6      Loss of earning                       163800          189000 (7500 x
         capacity                                             12 x 14 x 15%)
  7      Medical expenses                        2707              2707
  8      Bystanders expenses                     1000              1000
        Total                                  229507           264707

Amount enhanced = Rs.264707 - Rs.229507 - Rs.35,200/-

3. The Insurance Company shall pay interest for

the amounts awarded by the Tribunal at the rate directed in the impugned award and for the enhanced amounts at the rate of 5% from the date of petition. Since there was a delay of 114 days in filing the appeal, interest on the enhanced amount would not run for the said period. If any amounts have already been paid, the same shall be granted set off. The claimant shall produce the details of the Bank account before the Insurance Company/Tribunal within one month from

the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment

and amount shall be transferred to the Bank account directly through NEFT/RTGS mode, within a period of one month thereafter. If the Bank account is not given within the time stipulated, it is made clear that no interest shall run on the enhanced amount after the period stipulated by this Court. However, if the Insurance Company fails to deposit the amount, as directed, interest on the enhanced amount shall also run at the rate ordered by the MACA No.3063/2015 4 Tribunal from the date of petition. The appeal is allowed to the above extent. SD/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE Lgk

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial