Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Prameela vs Chandran

Prameela vs Chandran

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 28, 2022
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1476537

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MACA/2005/2011

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prameela

Respondent

Chandran

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias monday, the 28th day of february 2022 / 9th phalguna, 1943 against the award in op(mv) 1635/2003 of addl. motor accident claims tribunal ,thrissur appellant/petitioners 1 prameela w/o babu, aruniparambil house, karuvannur, thrissur. 2 priya w/o madhu, karappanparambil house, avanoor, thrissur. by adv sri.p.v.chandra mohan respondents/respondents: 1 chandran s/o unni ezhuthachan, 11/252,paraparambil house , avanoor p.o, thrissur district- 680 001. 2 santhosh s/o ayyappan, karoor house, p.o, karoor, via. mundur, thrissur district- 680 001. by adv sri.c.e.unnikrishnan this motor accident claims appeal having come up for admission on 28.02.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdespite the orders dated 27.9.2021 and 13.1.2022, the appellants have not taken steps to effect service of notice on the 2nd respondent. the appeal is of the year2011. it is assumed that the appellants are no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. sd/- c.s.dias ma/28.2.2022 judge /true copy/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1943 AGAINST THE AWARD IN OP(MV) 1635/2003 OF ADDL. MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,THRISSUR APPELLANT/PETITIONERS 1 PRAMEELA W/O BABU, ARUNIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KARUVANNUR, THRISSUR. 2 PRIYA W/O MADHU, KARAPPANPARAMBIL HOUSE, AVANOOR, THRISSUR. BY ADV SRI.P.V.CHANDRA MOHAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 CHANDRAN S/O UNNI EZHUTHACHAN, 11/252,PARAPARAMBIL HOUSE , AVANOOR P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT- 680 001. 2 SANTHOSH S/O AYYAPPAN, KAROOR HOUSE, P.O, KAROOR, VIA. MUNDUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT- 680 001. BY ADV SRI.C.E.UNNIKRISHNAN THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Despite the orders dated 27.9.2021 and 13.1.2022, the appellants have not taken steps to effect service of notice on the 2nd respondent. The appeal is of the year

2011. It is assumed that the appellants are no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. Sd/- C.S.DIAS ma/28.2.2022 JUDGE /True copy/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial