Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vasantha vs K.R.Chandran

Vasantha vs K.R.Chandran

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 19, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1476133

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/594/2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vasantha

Respondent

K.R.Chandran

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias wednesday, the 19th day of october 2022 / 27th aswina, 1944 against the order/judgment in os 328/2010 of principal sub court,attingal petitioner/s: vasantha aged 56 years d/o.raghavan, aged 56 years, kattuvila veedu,t.c.no.32/04, madhavapuram, ptp post, kochuveli,thiruvananthapuram district. by advs. sri.j.jayakumar smt.v.s.beena respondent/s: 1 k.r.chandran aged 61 years, s/o.raghavan, charuvila puthen 2 ammukutty aged 53 years, d/o.kunji, charuvila puthen 3 vasanthakumari aged 52 years, d/o.sumathy, charuvila puthen 4 geetha aged 50 years, d/o.rajamma, panayil veedu,thonnakottukonam, avanavancherry post, attingal,thiruvananthapuram dist. 5 rajasenan 6 rajan 7 ranjith this op (civil) having come up for admission on 19.10.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe original petition is filed challenging ext.p5 orderpassed in i.a.no.2173/2011 and ext.p7 order passed in i.a.no.2236/2011 in o.s.no.328/2010 of the court of the subordinate judge, attingal.2. when the original petition came up forconsideration along with op(c) no.525/2012 on 17.10.2022, this court had directed the registry to get instructions from the court of the subordinate judge, attingal, as to the present status and position of o.s.no.328/2010.3. it is informed that the suit itself has been dismissedon 04.12.2017. in the light of the above communication, i hold that nothing further survives in the original petition. hence, the original petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- c.s.dias, judge rkc/19.10.22

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 27TH ASWINA, 1944 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 328/2010 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ATTINGAL PETITIONER/S: VASANTHA AGED 56 YEARS D/O.RAGHAVAN, AGED 56 YEARS, KATTUVILA VEEDU,T.C.NO.32/04, MADHAVAPURAM, PTP POST, KOCHUVELI,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR SMT.V.S.BEENA RESPONDENT/S: 1 K.R.CHANDRAN AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.RAGHAVAN, CHARUVILA PUTHEN 2 AMMUKUTTY AGED 53 YEARS, D/O.KUNJI, CHARUVILA PUTHEN 3 VASANTHAKUMARI AGED 52 YEARS, D/O.SUMATHY, CHARUVILA PUTHEN 4 GEETHA AGED 50 YEARS, D/O.RAJAMMA, PANAYIL VEEDU,THONNAKOTTUKONAM, AVANAVANCHERRY POST, ATTINGAL,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST. 5 RAJASENAN 6 RAJAN 7 RANJITH THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The original petition is filed challenging Ext.P5 order

passed in I.A.No.2173/2011 and Ext.P7 order passed in I.A.No.2236/2011 in O.S.No.328/2010 of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Attingal.

2. When the original petition came up for

consideration along with OP(C) No.525/2012 on 17.10.2022, this Court had directed the Registry to get instructions from the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Attingal, as to the present status and position of O.S.No.328/2010.

3. It is informed that the suit itself has been dismissed

on 04.12.2017. In the light of the above communication, I hold that nothing further survives in the original petition. Hence, the original petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- C.S.DIAS, JUDGE rkc/19.10.22

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial