Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

M.K.Anandhan vs Usha

M.K.Anandhan vs USHA

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 11, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1474985

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRP/2776/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.K.Anandhan

Respondent

USHA

Excerpt

.....sri muthukumaran educational trust india praying to strike off the plaint filed in os.no. 147 of 2021 now pending for petitioner mr.n.jothi, senior counsel in all crp’s: for mr.b.natarajan page4 of 6 for respondent mr.ngr.prasad for r1 in all crp’s: for mr.d.thanigaivasan mr.r.suresh kumar for r2common orderthese civil revision petitions are filed seeking to strike off the plaint filed by the plaintiffs seeking a decree for injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing plaintiffs except by due process of law.2. it is brought to the notice of this court that the petitioners/defendants 1 and 2 already filed application seeking rejection of the plaint before the trial court and the same is still pending disposal.3. since the petitioners already filed application seeking rejection of theplaint by invoking order vii rule 11 of cpc, this court is not inclined to entertain these revision petitions and the revision petitions are disposed with direction to the trial court to dispose of the said applications as expeditiously as possible.4. with this direction, all the civil revision petitions are disposed of. no costs. 11-02-2026 index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no nr page5 of 6s.sounthar, j.nr to the district munsif court, sriperumbudur. crp no. 2776, 2786, 2788, 2799, 2826 of 2025 and cmp.nos.15704, 15998, 15766, 15755 and 15838 of 2025 11-02-2026 page6 of 6

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 2776, 2786, 2788, 2799, 2826 of 2025 and CMP.Nos.15704, 15998, 15766, 15755 and 15838 of 2025 CRP No. 2776 of 2025 Vs

1. Mrs.Usha India praying to strike off the Plaint filed in OS.No. 145 of 2021 now pending Page1 of 6 CRP No. 2826 of 2025 Vs

1. S.Ramachandran No.641, Ramasamy Salai, K.K.Nagar, Chennai 600 078 India praying to strike off the Plaint filed in OS.No. 144 of 2021 now pending CRP No. 2788 of 2025 Vs

1. Mrs.Devi Page2 of 6 No.641, Ramasamy Salai, K.K.Nagar, Chennai 600 078 India praying to strike off the Plaint filed in OS.No. 148 of 2021 now pending CRP No. 2786 of 2025 Vs

1. P.Mani India praying to strike off the Plaint filed in OS.No. 143 of 2021 now pending Page3 of 6 CRP No. 2799 of 2025 Vs

1. Mrs.Neela

2. Gopu

3. Sri Muthukumaran Educational Trust India praying to strike off the Plaint filed in OS.No. 147 of 2021 now pending For Petitioner Mr.N.Jothi, Senior Counsel in all CRP’s: for Mr.B.Natarajan Page4 of 6 For Respondent Mr.NGR.Prasad for R1 in all CRP’s: for Mr.D.Thanigaivasan Mr.R.Suresh Kumar for R2

COMMON ORDER

These civil revision petitions are filed seeking to strike off the plaint filed by the plaintiffs seeking a decree for injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing plaintiffs except by due process of law.

2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioners/defendants 1 and 2 already filed application seeking rejection of the plaint before the Trial Court and the same is still pending disposal.

3. Since the petitioners already filed application seeking rejection of the

plaint by invoking Order VII Rule 11 of CPC, this Court is not inclined to entertain these revision petitions and the revision petitions are disposed with direction to the trial court to dispose of the said applications as expeditiously as possible.

4. With this direction, all the civil revision petitions are disposed of. No costs. 11-02-2026 Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No nr Page5 of 6

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

NR To The District Munsif Court, Sriperumbudur. CRP No. 2776, 2786, 2788, 2799, 2826 of 2025 and CMP.Nos.15704, 15998, 15766, 15755 and 15838 of 2025 11-02-2026 Page6 of 6

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties M.K.Anandhan vs USHA Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales