Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P. Ravikumar vs the District Collector

P. Ravikumar vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 31, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1474844

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/14525/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P. Ravikumar

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.v.kunhikrishnan tuesday, the 31st day of may 2022 / 10th jyaishta, 1944 wp(c) no. 14525 of 2022 petitioner: p. ravikumar aged 66 years s/o.ramakrishnan, pallakkatt (h), kaniyarkode, thiruvilwamala, thrissur-680 594,president, parakkottukavu thalapoli committee padinjattumuri desam, thiruvilwamala, thrissur-680588 by adv l.rajesh narayan respondents:1 the district collector first floor, civil station, civil lines rd kalyan nagar, ayyanthole, thrissur-680003 2 district police chief, district police office thrissur- 680003 3 additional district magistrate, collectorate civil station, thrissur -680003 4 secretary, department of industrial policy and promotion ministry of commerce and industry, udyog bhavan, new delhi110011 5 deputy chief controller of explosives petroleum and explosives safety organisation(peso) kendriya bhavan, kakkanad, ernakulam- 682 037sri.manu.s, asgi, smt.vidya kuriakose, gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 31.05.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: w.p.(c).no.14525/2022p.v.kunhikrishnan, j.-------------------------------- w.p.(c).no.14525 of 2022 ---------------------------------------------- dated this the 31st day of may, 2022judgmentwhen this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the light of the interim order passed by this court, prayers in this writ petition are infructuous. therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, recording the interim order passed in this case. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan jv judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2022 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 14525 OF 2022 PETITIONER: P. RAVIKUMAR AGED 66 YEARS S/O.RAMAKRISHNAN, PALLAKKATT (H), KANIYARKODE, THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR-680 594,PRESIDENT, PARAKKOTTUKAVU THALAPOLI COMMITTEE PADINJATTUMURI DESAM, THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR-680588 BY ADV L.RAJESH NARAYAN RESPONDENTS:

1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR FIRST FLOOR, CIVIL STATION, CIVIL LINES RD KALYAN NAGAR, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR-680003 2 DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE THRISSUR- 680003 3 ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, COLLECTORATE CIVIL STATION, THRISSUR -680003 4 SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, UDYOG BHAVAN, NEW DELHI110011 5 DEPUTY CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES PETROLEUM AND EXPLOSIVES SAFETY ORGANISATION(PESO) KENDRIYA BHAVAN, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM- 682 037

SRI.MANU.S, ASGI, SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).No.14525/2022

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

-------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.14525 of 2022 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of May, 2022

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the light of the interim order passed by this Court, prayers in this writ petition are infructuous. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, recording the interim order passed in this case. sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JV JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial