Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

S.Krishnamoorthy Vs The commissioner

S.Krishnamoorthy vs The commissioner

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 02, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1474825

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/23483/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Krishnamoorthy

Respondent

The commissioner

Excerpt

.....commissioner, hr. and ce. department, hr. and ce. department,vaazhapadi. 5.d.rajendran respondent(s) prayer; writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to restrain the 5th respondent herein to conduct kumbabishekam scheduled to be held on 07.09.2022 for arulmigu shakthi vinyagar at arulmigu shakthi maariamman temple without obtaining prior permission form the respondents 1 to 3 herein and in pursuant to the order passed by the 4th respondnet vide na.ka. no. for petitioner(s): mr.k.m.vivekanandan for respondent(s): m/s. k.karthikeyan, ga rr1 to 4 mr.r.prabakar r5orderthis writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to restrain the 5th respondent herein to conduct kumbabishekam scheduled to be held on 07.09.2022 for arulmigu shakthi vinyagar at arulmigu shakthi maariamman temple without obtaining prior permission form the respondents 1 to 3 herein and in pursuant to the order passed by the 4th respondnet vide na.ka. no. 24/2021 dated 20.06.2022.2. today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present petition has become infructuous.3. recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. no costs. rli index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no to 1.the commissioner 119, uthamar gandhi rd, thousand lights west, nungambakkam, chennai - 600034. hr & ce department, kottaimari amman temple campus, near old bus stand, salem - 636 001. 3.the assistant commissioer, hr & ce department, hr & ce department,vaazhapadi. m.dhandapani j. rli

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02-03-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP No. 22436 of 2022

1. S.Krishnamoorthy

2. Shanmugasundaram Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The commissioner

119, Uthamar Gandhi Rd, Thousand Lights West, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600034. Hr And C.e Department, Kottaimari Amman Temple Campus, Near Old Bus Stand, Salem - 636 001. 3.The Assistant Commissioner, HR. And CE. Department, HR. And CE. Department,Vaazhapadi. 5.D.Rajendran Respondent(s) PRAYER; Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to restrain the 5th respondent herein to conduct kumbabishekam scheduled to be held on 07.09.2022 for Arulmigu Shakthi Vinyagar at Arulmigu Shakthi Maariamman Temple without obtaining prior permission form the respondents 1 to 3 herein and in pursuant to the order passed by the 4th respondnet vide Na.Ka. No. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.M.Vivekanandan For Respondent(s): M/s. K.Karthikeyan, GA RR1 to 4 Mr.R.Prabakar R5

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to restrain the 5th respondent herein to conduct kumbabishekam scheduled to be held on 07.09.2022 for Arulmigu Shakthi Vinyagar at Arulmigu Shakthi Maariamman Temple without obtaining prior permission form the respondents 1 to 3 herein and in pursuant to the order passed by the 4th respondnet vide Na.Ka. No. 24/2021 dated 20.06.2022.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present petition has become infructuous.

3. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. No costs. Rli Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The commissioner 119, Uthamar Gandhi Rd, Thousand Lights West, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600034. HR & CE Department, Kottaimari Amman Temple Campus, Near Old Bus Stand, Salem - 636 001. 3.The Assistant Commissioer, HR & CE Department, HR & CE Department,vaazhapadi. M.DHANDAPANI J. rli

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties S.Krishnamoorthy vs The commissioner Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales